Tibetan Diaspora, Mobility and Place: ‘Exiles in Their Own Homeland’

Chris Vasantkumar*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article elaborates a theoretical framework for making sense of Tibetans in Tibet who live as ‘exiles in their own homeland’. Placing questions of mobility at the centre of anthropological approaches to diaspora, it subjects ‘the fact of movement’ to critical scrutiny. In so doing it calls into question three fundamental assumptions of recent work in both ‘new mobilities’ and the study of diaspora more broadly: first, that people move and territory does not; second, that ‘place(s)’ and ‘movement(s)’ are different sorts of things, and clearly distinguishable; and, third, that movement takes places only in Euclidean space. Beginning by placing recent Tibetan experiences of exile and diaspora in comparative context, it then works through recent deconstructions of the boundary between movement and place, a critique of Western ethno-epistemologies of movement, and Law and Mol’s work on social topology as theoretical orientations that might allow us to make sense of mobile homelands and diasporas in situ.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)115-136
    Number of pages22
    JournalTheory, Culture and Society
    Volume34
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

    Keywords

    • actor-network theory
    • anthropology
    • diaspora
    • home
    • mobility
    • space
    • topology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Tibetan Diaspora, Mobility and Place: ‘Exiles in Their Own Homeland’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this