Time to change how we measure quality of life and well-being in autism: a systematic review

Kate Simpson*, J. Paynter, M. Westerveld, L. van der Meer, L. Patrick, G. Hogg, Melanie Heyworth, A. Gable, H. S. Chandran, Rachel Bowen, Dawn Adams

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This review examines methods used to report on the QoL and/or well-being of autistic people. A search of four databases (June 2023) identified 256 studies that reported on the Qol and/or well-being of at least one autistic person. The quality of studies varied. Results were synthesised on who reported, who was reported on, how information was obtained including accommodations and community involvement. One-third used proxy informants, over 80% used generic measures of QoL and/or well-being, autistic people with intellectual impairment and communication disorders were underrepresented, one quarter included accommodations, and few studies included community involvement. Despite the growing research on QoL and well-being of autistic people, more accessible and inclusive research is required to understand autistic people’s experience.

Original languageEnglish
JournalReview Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Mar 2024

Keywords

  • Autism
  • Co-occurring conditions
  • Life outcomes
  • Participatory research
  • Wellness

Cite this