To fish or not to fish: factors at multiple scales affecting artisanal fishers' readiness to exit a declining fishery

Tim M. Daw, Joshua E. Cinner, Timothy R. McClanahan, Katrina Brown, Selina M. Stead, Nicholas A J Graham, Joseph Maina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Globally, fisheries are challenged by the combined impacts of overfishing, degradation of ecosystems and impacts of climate change, while fisheries livelihoods are further pressured by conservation policy imperatives. Fishers' adaptive responses to these pressures, such as exiting from a fishery to pursue alternative livelihoods, determine their own vulnerability, as well as the potential for reducing fishing effort and sustaining fisheries. The willingness and ability to make particular adaptations in response to change, such as exiting from a declining fishery, is influenced by economic, cultural and institutional factors operating at scales from individual fishers to national economies. Previous studies of exit from fisheries at single or few sites, offer limited insight into the relative importance of individual and larger-scale social and economic factors. We asked 599 fishers how they would respond to hypothetical scenarios of catch declines in 28 sites in five western Indian Ocean countries. We investigated how socioeconomic variables at the individual-, household- and site-scale affected whether they would exit fisheries. Site-level factors had the greatest influence on readiness to exit, but these relationships were contrary to common predictions. Specifically, higher levels of infrastructure development and economic vitality - expected to promote exit from fisheries - were associated with less readiness to exit. This may be due to site level histories of exit from fisheries, greater specialisation of fishing households, or higher rewards from fishing in more economically developed sites due to technology, market access, catch value and government subsidies. At the individual and household scale, fishers from households with more livelihood activities, and fishers with lower catch value were more willing to exit. These results demonstrate empirically how adaptive responses to change are influenced by factors at multiple scales, and highlight the importance of understanding natural resource-based livelihoods in the context of the wider economy and society.

LanguageEnglish
Article numbere31460
Pages1-10
Number of pages10
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Fisheries
Fish
Fishes
fisheries
fish
livelihood
households
Economics
Government Financing
market access
Indian Ocean
economics
Aptitude
economic factors
Economic Development
socioeconomic factors
Climate Change
overfishing
Natural resources
subsidies

Cite this

Daw, T. M., Cinner, J. E., McClanahan, T. R., Brown, K., Stead, S. M., Graham, N. A. J., & Maina, J. (2012). To fish or not to fish: factors at multiple scales affecting artisanal fishers' readiness to exit a declining fishery. PLoS ONE, 7(2), 1-10. [e31460]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031460
Daw, Tim M. ; Cinner, Joshua E. ; McClanahan, Timothy R. ; Brown, Katrina ; Stead, Selina M. ; Graham, Nicholas A J ; Maina, Joseph. / To fish or not to fish : factors at multiple scales affecting artisanal fishers' readiness to exit a declining fishery. In: PLoS ONE. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 1-10.
@article{5ebe23ecacdf4cc6bef45a0dde33e66a,
title = "To fish or not to fish: factors at multiple scales affecting artisanal fishers' readiness to exit a declining fishery",
abstract = "Globally, fisheries are challenged by the combined impacts of overfishing, degradation of ecosystems and impacts of climate change, while fisheries livelihoods are further pressured by conservation policy imperatives. Fishers' adaptive responses to these pressures, such as exiting from a fishery to pursue alternative livelihoods, determine their own vulnerability, as well as the potential for reducing fishing effort and sustaining fisheries. The willingness and ability to make particular adaptations in response to change, such as exiting from a declining fishery, is influenced by economic, cultural and institutional factors operating at scales from individual fishers to national economies. Previous studies of exit from fisheries at single or few sites, offer limited insight into the relative importance of individual and larger-scale social and economic factors. We asked 599 fishers how they would respond to hypothetical scenarios of catch declines in 28 sites in five western Indian Ocean countries. We investigated how socioeconomic variables at the individual-, household- and site-scale affected whether they would exit fisheries. Site-level factors had the greatest influence on readiness to exit, but these relationships were contrary to common predictions. Specifically, higher levels of infrastructure development and economic vitality - expected to promote exit from fisheries - were associated with less readiness to exit. This may be due to site level histories of exit from fisheries, greater specialisation of fishing households, or higher rewards from fishing in more economically developed sites due to technology, market access, catch value and government subsidies. At the individual and household scale, fishers from households with more livelihood activities, and fishers with lower catch value were more willing to exit. These results demonstrate empirically how adaptive responses to change are influenced by factors at multiple scales, and highlight the importance of understanding natural resource-based livelihoods in the context of the wider economy and society.",
author = "Daw, {Tim M.} and Cinner, {Joshua E.} and McClanahan, {Timothy R.} and Katrina Brown and Stead, {Selina M.} and Graham, {Nicholas A J} and Joseph Maina",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0031460",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "2",

}

To fish or not to fish : factors at multiple scales affecting artisanal fishers' readiness to exit a declining fishery. / Daw, Tim M.; Cinner, Joshua E.; McClanahan, Timothy R.; Brown, Katrina; Stead, Selina M.; Graham, Nicholas A J; Maina, Joseph.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 7, No. 2, e31460, 2012, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - To fish or not to fish

T2 - PLoS ONE

AU - Daw, Tim M.

AU - Cinner, Joshua E.

AU - McClanahan, Timothy R.

AU - Brown, Katrina

AU - Stead, Selina M.

AU - Graham, Nicholas A J

AU - Maina, Joseph

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Globally, fisheries are challenged by the combined impacts of overfishing, degradation of ecosystems and impacts of climate change, while fisheries livelihoods are further pressured by conservation policy imperatives. Fishers' adaptive responses to these pressures, such as exiting from a fishery to pursue alternative livelihoods, determine their own vulnerability, as well as the potential for reducing fishing effort and sustaining fisheries. The willingness and ability to make particular adaptations in response to change, such as exiting from a declining fishery, is influenced by economic, cultural and institutional factors operating at scales from individual fishers to national economies. Previous studies of exit from fisheries at single or few sites, offer limited insight into the relative importance of individual and larger-scale social and economic factors. We asked 599 fishers how they would respond to hypothetical scenarios of catch declines in 28 sites in five western Indian Ocean countries. We investigated how socioeconomic variables at the individual-, household- and site-scale affected whether they would exit fisheries. Site-level factors had the greatest influence on readiness to exit, but these relationships were contrary to common predictions. Specifically, higher levels of infrastructure development and economic vitality - expected to promote exit from fisheries - were associated with less readiness to exit. This may be due to site level histories of exit from fisheries, greater specialisation of fishing households, or higher rewards from fishing in more economically developed sites due to technology, market access, catch value and government subsidies. At the individual and household scale, fishers from households with more livelihood activities, and fishers with lower catch value were more willing to exit. These results demonstrate empirically how adaptive responses to change are influenced by factors at multiple scales, and highlight the importance of understanding natural resource-based livelihoods in the context of the wider economy and society.

AB - Globally, fisheries are challenged by the combined impacts of overfishing, degradation of ecosystems and impacts of climate change, while fisheries livelihoods are further pressured by conservation policy imperatives. Fishers' adaptive responses to these pressures, such as exiting from a fishery to pursue alternative livelihoods, determine their own vulnerability, as well as the potential for reducing fishing effort and sustaining fisheries. The willingness and ability to make particular adaptations in response to change, such as exiting from a declining fishery, is influenced by economic, cultural and institutional factors operating at scales from individual fishers to national economies. Previous studies of exit from fisheries at single or few sites, offer limited insight into the relative importance of individual and larger-scale social and economic factors. We asked 599 fishers how they would respond to hypothetical scenarios of catch declines in 28 sites in five western Indian Ocean countries. We investigated how socioeconomic variables at the individual-, household- and site-scale affected whether they would exit fisheries. Site-level factors had the greatest influence on readiness to exit, but these relationships were contrary to common predictions. Specifically, higher levels of infrastructure development and economic vitality - expected to promote exit from fisheries - were associated with less readiness to exit. This may be due to site level histories of exit from fisheries, greater specialisation of fishing households, or higher rewards from fishing in more economically developed sites due to technology, market access, catch value and government subsidies. At the individual and household scale, fishers from households with more livelihood activities, and fishers with lower catch value were more willing to exit. These results demonstrate empirically how adaptive responses to change are influenced by factors at multiple scales, and highlight the importance of understanding natural resource-based livelihoods in the context of the wider economy and society.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856793566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0031460

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0031460

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 2

M1 - e31460

ER -