Towards a general framework for the assessment of interactive effects of multiple stressors on aquatic ecosystems: results from the Making Aquatic Ecosystems Great Again (MAEGA) workshop

Paul J. Van den Brink, Sally A. Bracewell, Alex Bush, Anthony Chariton, Catherine B. Choung, Zacchaeus G. Compson, Katherine A. Dafforn, Kathryn Korbel, David R. Lapen, Mariana Mayer-Pinto, Wendy A. Monk, Allyson L. O'Brien, Natalie K. Rideout, Ralf B. Schäfer, Kizar A. Sumon, Ralf C. M. Verdonschot, Donald J. Baird

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

A workshop was held in Wageningen, The Netherlands, in September 2017 to collate data and literature on three aquatic ecosystem types (agricultural drainage ditches, urban floodplains, and urban estuaries), and develop a general framework for the assessment of multiple stressors on the structure and functioning of these systems. An assessment framework considering multiple stressors is crucial for our understanding of ecosystem responses within a multiply stressed environment, and to inform appropriate environmental management strategies. The framework consists of two components: (i) problem identification and (ii) impact assessment. Both assessments together proceed through the following steps: 1) ecosystem selection; 2) identification of stressors and quantification of their intensity; 3) identification of receptors or sensitive groups for each stressor; 4) identification of stressor-response relationships and their potential interactions; 5) construction of an ecological model that includes relevant functional groups and endpoints; 6) prediction of impacts of multiple stressors, 7) confirmation of these predictions with experimental and monitoring data, and 8) potential adjustment of the ecological model. Steps 7 and 8 allow the assessment to be adaptive and can be repeated until a satisfactory match between model predictions and experimental and monitoring data has been obtained. This paper is the preface of the MAEGA (Making Aquatic Ecosystems Great Again) special section that includes three associated papers which are also published in this volume, which present applications of the framework for each of the three aquatic systems.

LanguageEnglish
Pages722-726
Number of pages5
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume684
Early online date1 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Aquatic ecosystems
aquatic ecosystem
Ecosystems
prediction
ecosystem response
Environmental management
Monitoring
Estuaries
environmental management
Functional groups
Drainage
functional group
floodplain
estuary
drainage
ecosystem
effect
monitoring data

Keywords

  • multiple stressors
  • aquatic ecosystems
  • workshop
  • ecological models
  • ecological risk assessment framework

Cite this

Van den Brink, Paul J. ; Bracewell, Sally A. ; Bush, Alex ; Chariton, Anthony ; Choung, Catherine B. ; Compson, Zacchaeus G. ; Dafforn, Katherine A. ; Korbel, Kathryn ; Lapen, David R. ; Mayer-Pinto, Mariana ; Monk, Wendy A. ; O'Brien, Allyson L. ; Rideout, Natalie K. ; Schäfer, Ralf B. ; Sumon, Kizar A. ; Verdonschot, Ralf C. M. ; Baird, Donald J. / Towards a general framework for the assessment of interactive effects of multiple stressors on aquatic ecosystems : results from the Making Aquatic Ecosystems Great Again (MAEGA) workshop. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2019 ; Vol. 684. pp. 722-726.
@article{ede64508a45648fe90a49194bfa26b00,
title = "Towards a general framework for the assessment of interactive effects of multiple stressors on aquatic ecosystems: results from the Making Aquatic Ecosystems Great Again (MAEGA) workshop",
abstract = "A workshop was held in Wageningen, The Netherlands, in September 2017 to collate data and literature on three aquatic ecosystem types (agricultural drainage ditches, urban floodplains, and urban estuaries), and develop a general framework for the assessment of multiple stressors on the structure and functioning of these systems. An assessment framework considering multiple stressors is crucial for our understanding of ecosystem responses within a multiply stressed environment, and to inform appropriate environmental management strategies. The framework consists of two components: (i) problem identification and (ii) impact assessment. Both assessments together proceed through the following steps: 1) ecosystem selection; 2) identification of stressors and quantification of their intensity; 3) identification of receptors or sensitive groups for each stressor; 4) identification of stressor-response relationships and their potential interactions; 5) construction of an ecological model that includes relevant functional groups and endpoints; 6) prediction of impacts of multiple stressors, 7) confirmation of these predictions with experimental and monitoring data, and 8) potential adjustment of the ecological model. Steps 7 and 8 allow the assessment to be adaptive and can be repeated until a satisfactory match between model predictions and experimental and monitoring data has been obtained. This paper is the preface of the MAEGA (Making Aquatic Ecosystems Great Again) special section that includes three associated papers which are also published in this volume, which present applications of the framework for each of the three aquatic systems.",
keywords = "multiple stressors, aquatic ecosystems, workshop, ecological models, ecological risk assessment framework",
author = "{Van den Brink}, {Paul J.} and Bracewell, {Sally A.} and Alex Bush and Anthony Chariton and Choung, {Catherine B.} and Compson, {Zacchaeus G.} and Dafforn, {Katherine A.} and Kathryn Korbel and Lapen, {David R.} and Mariana Mayer-Pinto and Monk, {Wendy A.} and O'Brien, {Allyson L.} and Rideout, {Natalie K.} and Sch{\"a}fer, {Ralf B.} and Sumon, {Kizar A.} and Verdonschot, {Ralf C. M.} and Baird, {Donald J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.455",
language = "English",
volume = "684",
pages = "722--726",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Van den Brink, PJ, Bracewell, SA, Bush, A, Chariton, A, Choung, CB, Compson, ZG, Dafforn, KA, Korbel, K, Lapen, DR, Mayer-Pinto, M, Monk, WA, O'Brien, AL, Rideout, NK, Schäfer, RB, Sumon, KA, Verdonschot, RCM & Baird, DJ 2019, 'Towards a general framework for the assessment of interactive effects of multiple stressors on aquatic ecosystems: results from the Making Aquatic Ecosystems Great Again (MAEGA) workshop', Science of the Total Environment, vol. 684, pp. 722-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.455

Towards a general framework for the assessment of interactive effects of multiple stressors on aquatic ecosystems : results from the Making Aquatic Ecosystems Great Again (MAEGA) workshop. / Van den Brink, Paul J.; Bracewell, Sally A.; Bush, Alex; Chariton, Anthony; Choung, Catherine B.; Compson, Zacchaeus G.; Dafforn, Katherine A.; Korbel, Kathryn; Lapen, David R.; Mayer-Pinto, Mariana; Monk, Wendy A.; O'Brien, Allyson L.; Rideout, Natalie K.; Schäfer, Ralf B.; Sumon, Kizar A.; Verdonschot, Ralf C. M.; Baird, Donald J.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 684, 20.09.2019, p. 722-726.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a general framework for the assessment of interactive effects of multiple stressors on aquatic ecosystems

T2 - Science of the Total Environment

AU - Van den Brink, Paul J.

AU - Bracewell, Sally A.

AU - Bush, Alex

AU - Chariton, Anthony

AU - Choung, Catherine B.

AU - Compson, Zacchaeus G.

AU - Dafforn, Katherine A.

AU - Korbel, Kathryn

AU - Lapen, David R.

AU - Mayer-Pinto, Mariana

AU - Monk, Wendy A.

AU - O'Brien, Allyson L.

AU - Rideout, Natalie K.

AU - Schäfer, Ralf B.

AU - Sumon, Kizar A.

AU - Verdonschot, Ralf C. M.

AU - Baird, Donald J.

PY - 2019/9/20

Y1 - 2019/9/20

N2 - A workshop was held in Wageningen, The Netherlands, in September 2017 to collate data and literature on three aquatic ecosystem types (agricultural drainage ditches, urban floodplains, and urban estuaries), and develop a general framework for the assessment of multiple stressors on the structure and functioning of these systems. An assessment framework considering multiple stressors is crucial for our understanding of ecosystem responses within a multiply stressed environment, and to inform appropriate environmental management strategies. The framework consists of two components: (i) problem identification and (ii) impact assessment. Both assessments together proceed through the following steps: 1) ecosystem selection; 2) identification of stressors and quantification of their intensity; 3) identification of receptors or sensitive groups for each stressor; 4) identification of stressor-response relationships and their potential interactions; 5) construction of an ecological model that includes relevant functional groups and endpoints; 6) prediction of impacts of multiple stressors, 7) confirmation of these predictions with experimental and monitoring data, and 8) potential adjustment of the ecological model. Steps 7 and 8 allow the assessment to be adaptive and can be repeated until a satisfactory match between model predictions and experimental and monitoring data has been obtained. This paper is the preface of the MAEGA (Making Aquatic Ecosystems Great Again) special section that includes three associated papers which are also published in this volume, which present applications of the framework for each of the three aquatic systems.

AB - A workshop was held in Wageningen, The Netherlands, in September 2017 to collate data and literature on three aquatic ecosystem types (agricultural drainage ditches, urban floodplains, and urban estuaries), and develop a general framework for the assessment of multiple stressors on the structure and functioning of these systems. An assessment framework considering multiple stressors is crucial for our understanding of ecosystem responses within a multiply stressed environment, and to inform appropriate environmental management strategies. The framework consists of two components: (i) problem identification and (ii) impact assessment. Both assessments together proceed through the following steps: 1) ecosystem selection; 2) identification of stressors and quantification of their intensity; 3) identification of receptors or sensitive groups for each stressor; 4) identification of stressor-response relationships and their potential interactions; 5) construction of an ecological model that includes relevant functional groups and endpoints; 6) prediction of impacts of multiple stressors, 7) confirmation of these predictions with experimental and monitoring data, and 8) potential adjustment of the ecological model. Steps 7 and 8 allow the assessment to be adaptive and can be repeated until a satisfactory match between model predictions and experimental and monitoring data has been obtained. This paper is the preface of the MAEGA (Making Aquatic Ecosystems Great Again) special section that includes three associated papers which are also published in this volume, which present applications of the framework for each of the three aquatic systems.

KW - multiple stressors

KW - aquatic ecosystems

KW - workshop

KW - ecological models

KW - ecological risk assessment framework

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061783036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.455

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.455

M3 - Article

VL - 684

SP - 722

EP - 726

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -