Training leaders for resilient health care: Negotiation 101 for healthcare executives

Robyn Clay-Williams, Zhicheng Li, Paul Lane, Lauren Camilleri, Teresa Winata, Andrew Johnson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding contributionResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Context: This study reports on evaluation of a two-day intensive negotiation skills training course, delivered to senior clinicians, managers, and executives within an Australian health service.
Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the negotiation training, by exploring whether staff members have implemented negotiation skills in their workplace in the time period since the training, and if so, how and when.
Methodology: The study used a qualitative approach, involving face-to-face interviews with 18 staff members who have completed the training. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and inductive interpretive analysis techniques used to identify common themes.
Main results: Participants generally reported positive affective and utility reactions to the training, and all participants attempted to implement as least some of the skills in the workplace. The largest enabler for implementing the training was identified as provision of a Negotiation Toolkit, consisting of tools and worksheets to assist in preparing and conducting negotiations. The biggest barrier to implementing the skills in the workplace was identified as lack of time to reflect on the principles and to prepare for upcoming negotiations. Ongoing
skill development and retention were identified by most participants as not adequately addressed; suggestions for improving sustainability included provision of refresher training, mentoring, and/or allocating each participant a ‘person to call’ to discuss difficult or complex negotiations as they arose.
Conclusion: The training was well matched to the needs of participants, with negotiation a common and daily activity for most healthcare professionals. Implementation of the skills showed potential for improving collaboration and problem solving in the Australian health service studied.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationHealthcare and society
Subtitle of host publicationnew challenges, new opportunities: proceedings
Place of PublicationToulouse, France
PublisherHealthcare systems Ergonomics and Patient Safety Conference
Pages123-130
Number of pages8
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Event2016 Human Ergonomics and Patient Safety Conference - Toulouse, France
Duration: 5 Oct 20167 Oct 2016

Conference

Conference2016 Human Ergonomics and Patient Safety Conference
CountryFrance
CityToulouse
Period5/10/167/10/16

Fingerprint

Negotiating
Delivery of Health Care
Workplace
Health Services
Interviews

Keywords

  • resilient health care
  • training
  • negotiation
  • non-technical skills

Cite this

Clay-Williams, R., Li, Z., Lane, P., Camilleri, L., Winata, T., & Johnson, A. (2016). Training leaders for resilient health care: Negotiation 101 for healthcare executives. In Healthcare and society: new challenges, new opportunities: proceedings (pp. 123-130). Toulouse, France: Healthcare systems Ergonomics and Patient Safety Conference.
Clay-Williams, Robyn ; Li, Zhicheng ; Lane, Paul ; Camilleri, Lauren ; Winata, Teresa ; Johnson, Andrew. / Training leaders for resilient health care : Negotiation 101 for healthcare executives. Healthcare and society: new challenges, new opportunities: proceedings. Toulouse, France : Healthcare systems Ergonomics and Patient Safety Conference, 2016. pp. 123-130
@inproceedings{ee84e8486e3841a3987638e24c2ceb38,
title = "Training leaders for resilient health care: Negotiation 101 for healthcare executives",
abstract = "Context: This study reports on evaluation of a two-day intensive negotiation skills training course, delivered to senior clinicians, managers, and executives within an Australian health service.Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the negotiation training, by exploring whether staff members have implemented negotiation skills in their workplace in the time period since the training, and if so, how and when.Methodology: The study used a qualitative approach, involving face-to-face interviews with 18 staff members who have completed the training. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and inductive interpretive analysis techniques used to identify common themes.Main results: Participants generally reported positive affective and utility reactions to the training, and all participants attempted to implement as least some of the skills in the workplace. The largest enabler for implementing the training was identified as provision of a Negotiation Toolkit, consisting of tools and worksheets to assist in preparing and conducting negotiations. The biggest barrier to implementing the skills in the workplace was identified as lack of time to reflect on the principles and to prepare for upcoming negotiations. Ongoingskill development and retention were identified by most participants as not adequately addressed; suggestions for improving sustainability included provision of refresher training, mentoring, and/or allocating each participant a ‘person to call’ to discuss difficult or complex negotiations as they arose.Conclusion: The training was well matched to the needs of participants, with negotiation a common and daily activity for most healthcare professionals. Implementation of the skills showed potential for improving collaboration and problem solving in the Australian health service studied.",
keywords = "resilient health care, training , negotiation, non-technical skills",
author = "Robyn Clay-Williams and Zhicheng Li and Paul Lane and Lauren Camilleri and Teresa Winata and Andrew Johnson",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
pages = "123--130",
booktitle = "Healthcare and society",
publisher = "Healthcare systems Ergonomics and Patient Safety Conference",

}

Clay-Williams, R, Li, Z, Lane, P, Camilleri, L, Winata, T & Johnson, A 2016, Training leaders for resilient health care: Negotiation 101 for healthcare executives. in Healthcare and society: new challenges, new opportunities: proceedings. Healthcare systems Ergonomics and Patient Safety Conference, Toulouse, France, pp. 123-130, 2016 Human Ergonomics and Patient Safety Conference, Toulouse, France, 5/10/16.

Training leaders for resilient health care : Negotiation 101 for healthcare executives. / Clay-Williams, Robyn; Li, Zhicheng; Lane, Paul; Camilleri, Lauren; Winata, Teresa; Johnson, Andrew.

Healthcare and society: new challenges, new opportunities: proceedings. Toulouse, France : Healthcare systems Ergonomics and Patient Safety Conference, 2016. p. 123-130.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding contributionResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Training leaders for resilient health care

T2 - Negotiation 101 for healthcare executives

AU - Clay-Williams, Robyn

AU - Li, Zhicheng

AU - Lane, Paul

AU - Camilleri, Lauren

AU - Winata, Teresa

AU - Johnson, Andrew

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Context: This study reports on evaluation of a two-day intensive negotiation skills training course, delivered to senior clinicians, managers, and executives within an Australian health service.Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the negotiation training, by exploring whether staff members have implemented negotiation skills in their workplace in the time period since the training, and if so, how and when.Methodology: The study used a qualitative approach, involving face-to-face interviews with 18 staff members who have completed the training. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and inductive interpretive analysis techniques used to identify common themes.Main results: Participants generally reported positive affective and utility reactions to the training, and all participants attempted to implement as least some of the skills in the workplace. The largest enabler for implementing the training was identified as provision of a Negotiation Toolkit, consisting of tools and worksheets to assist in preparing and conducting negotiations. The biggest barrier to implementing the skills in the workplace was identified as lack of time to reflect on the principles and to prepare for upcoming negotiations. Ongoingskill development and retention were identified by most participants as not adequately addressed; suggestions for improving sustainability included provision of refresher training, mentoring, and/or allocating each participant a ‘person to call’ to discuss difficult or complex negotiations as they arose.Conclusion: The training was well matched to the needs of participants, with negotiation a common and daily activity for most healthcare professionals. Implementation of the skills showed potential for improving collaboration and problem solving in the Australian health service studied.

AB - Context: This study reports on evaluation of a two-day intensive negotiation skills training course, delivered to senior clinicians, managers, and executives within an Australian health service.Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the negotiation training, by exploring whether staff members have implemented negotiation skills in their workplace in the time period since the training, and if so, how and when.Methodology: The study used a qualitative approach, involving face-to-face interviews with 18 staff members who have completed the training. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and inductive interpretive analysis techniques used to identify common themes.Main results: Participants generally reported positive affective and utility reactions to the training, and all participants attempted to implement as least some of the skills in the workplace. The largest enabler for implementing the training was identified as provision of a Negotiation Toolkit, consisting of tools and worksheets to assist in preparing and conducting negotiations. The biggest barrier to implementing the skills in the workplace was identified as lack of time to reflect on the principles and to prepare for upcoming negotiations. Ongoingskill development and retention were identified by most participants as not adequately addressed; suggestions for improving sustainability included provision of refresher training, mentoring, and/or allocating each participant a ‘person to call’ to discuss difficult or complex negotiations as they arose.Conclusion: The training was well matched to the needs of participants, with negotiation a common and daily activity for most healthcare professionals. Implementation of the skills showed potential for improving collaboration and problem solving in the Australian health service studied.

KW - resilient health care

KW - training

KW - negotiation

KW - non-technical skills

M3 - Conference proceeding contribution

SP - 123

EP - 130

BT - Healthcare and society

PB - Healthcare systems Ergonomics and Patient Safety Conference

CY - Toulouse, France

ER -

Clay-Williams R, Li Z, Lane P, Camilleri L, Winata T, Johnson A. Training leaders for resilient health care: Negotiation 101 for healthcare executives. In Healthcare and society: new challenges, new opportunities: proceedings. Toulouse, France: Healthcare systems Ergonomics and Patient Safety Conference. 2016. p. 123-130