Transformative governance of biodiversity: insights for sustainable development

Ingrid J. Visseren-Hamaker; Jona Razzaque; Pamela McElwee; Esther Turnhout; Eszter Kelemen; Graciela M. Rusch; Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares; Ivis Chan; Michelle Lim; Mine Islar; Ambika P. Gautam; Meryl Williams; Eric Mungatana; Md Saiful Karim; Roldan Muradian; Leah R. Gerber; Gabriel Lui; Jinlong Liu; Joachim H. Spangenberg; Dara Zaleski

doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.002

Transformative governance of biodiversity: insights for sustainable development

Ingrid J. Visseren-Hamaker, Jona Razzaque, Pamela McElwee, Esther Turnhout, Eszter Kelemen, Graciela M. Rusch, Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares, Ivis Chan, Michelle Lim, Mine Islar, Ambika P. Gautam, Meryl Williams, Eric Mungatana, Md Saiful Karim, Roldan Muradian, Leah R. Gerber, Gabriel Lui, Jinlong Liu, Joachim H. Spangenberg, Dara Zaleski

Macquarie Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

189 Citations (Scopus)

54 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

While there is much debate on transformative change among academics and policymakers, the discussion on how to govern such change is still in its infancy. This article argues that transformative governance is needed to enable the transformative change necessary for achieving global sustainability goals. Based on a literature review, the article unpacks this concept of transformative governance. It is: integrative, to ensure local solutions also have sustainable impacts elsewhere (across scales, places, issues and sectors); inclusive, to empower those whose interests are currently not being met and represent values embodying transformative change for sustainability; adaptive, enabling learning, experimentation, and reflexivity, to cope with the complexity of transformative change; and pluralist, recognizing different knowledge systems. We argue that only when these four governance approaches are: implemented in conjunction; operationalized in a specific manner; and focused on addressing the indirect drivers underlying sustainability issues, governance becomes transformative.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	20-28
Number of pages	9
Journal	Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Volume	53
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.002
Publication status	Published - Dec 2021

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2021. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Access to Document

10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.002

Publisher version (open access)Final published version, 528 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

Visseren-Hamaker, I. J., Razzaque, J., McElwee, P., Turnhout, E., Kelemen, E., Rusch, G. M., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Chan, I., Lim, M., Islar, M., Gautam, A. P., Williams, M., Mungatana, E., Karim, M. S., Muradian, R., Gerber, L. R., Lui, G., Liu, J., Spangenberg, J. H., & Zaleski, D. (2021). Transformative governance of biodiversity: insights for sustainable development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 53, 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.002

@article{6e6acaa7f73a42ef874ff9a4f53076f1,

title = "Transformative governance of biodiversity: insights for sustainable development",

abstract = "While there is much debate on transformative change among academics and policymakers, the discussion on how to govern such change is still in its infancy. This article argues that transformative governance is needed to enable the transformative change necessary for achieving global sustainability goals. Based on a literature review, the article unpacks this concept of transformative governance. It is: integrative, to ensure local solutions also have sustainable impacts elsewhere (across scales, places, issues and sectors); inclusive, to empower those whose interests are currently not being met and represent values embodying transformative change for sustainability; adaptive, enabling learning, experimentation, and reflexivity, to cope with the complexity of transformative change; and pluralist, recognizing different knowledge systems. We argue that only when these four governance approaches are: implemented in conjunction; operationalized in a specific manner; and focused on addressing the indirect drivers underlying sustainability issues, governance becomes transformative.",

author = "Visseren-Hamaker, \{Ingrid J.\} and Jona Razzaque and Pamela McElwee and Esther Turnhout and Eszter Kelemen and Rusch, \{Graciela M.\} and {\'A}lvaro Fern{\'a}ndez-Llamazares and Ivis Chan and Michelle Lim and Mine Islar and Gautam, \{Ambika P.\} and Meryl Williams and Eric Mungatana and Karim, \{Md Saiful\} and Roldan Muradian and Gerber, \{Leah R.\} and Gabriel Lui and Jinlong Liu and Spangenberg, \{Joachim H.\} and Dara Zaleski",

note = "Copyright the Author(s) 2021. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",

year = "2021",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.002",

language = "English",

volume = "53",

pages = "20--28",

journal = "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability",

issn = "1877-3435",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Visseren-Hamaker, IJ, Razzaque, J, McElwee, P, Turnhout, E, Kelemen, E, Rusch, GM, Fernández-Llamazares, Á, Chan, I, Lim, M, Islar, M, Gautam, AP, Williams, M, Mungatana, E, Karim, MS, Muradian, R, Gerber, LR, Lui, G, Liu, J, Spangenberg, JH & Zaleski, D 2021, 'Transformative governance of biodiversity: insights for sustainable development', Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 53, pp. 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.002

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transformative governance of biodiversity

T2 - insights for sustainable development

AU - Visseren-Hamaker, Ingrid J.

AU - Razzaque, Jona

AU - McElwee, Pamela

AU - Turnhout, Esther

AU - Kelemen, Eszter

AU - Rusch, Graciela M.

AU - Fernández-Llamazares, Álvaro

AU - Chan, Ivis

AU - Lim, Michelle

AU - Islar, Mine

AU - Gautam, Ambika P.

AU - Williams, Meryl

AU - Mungatana, Eric

AU - Karim, Md Saiful

AU - Muradian, Roldan

AU - Gerber, Leah R.

AU - Lui, Gabriel

AU - Liu, Jinlong

AU - Spangenberg, Joachim H.

AU - Zaleski, Dara

N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2021. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2021/12

Y1 - 2021/12

N2 - While there is much debate on transformative change among academics and policymakers, the discussion on how to govern such change is still in its infancy. This article argues that transformative governance is needed to enable the transformative change necessary for achieving global sustainability goals. Based on a literature review, the article unpacks this concept of transformative governance. It is: integrative, to ensure local solutions also have sustainable impacts elsewhere (across scales, places, issues and sectors); inclusive, to empower those whose interests are currently not being met and represent values embodying transformative change for sustainability; adaptive, enabling learning, experimentation, and reflexivity, to cope with the complexity of transformative change; and pluralist, recognizing different knowledge systems. We argue that only when these four governance approaches are: implemented in conjunction; operationalized in a specific manner; and focused on addressing the indirect drivers underlying sustainability issues, governance becomes transformative.

AB - While there is much debate on transformative change among academics and policymakers, the discussion on how to govern such change is still in its infancy. This article argues that transformative governance is needed to enable the transformative change necessary for achieving global sustainability goals. Based on a literature review, the article unpacks this concept of transformative governance. It is: integrative, to ensure local solutions also have sustainable impacts elsewhere (across scales, places, issues and sectors); inclusive, to empower those whose interests are currently not being met and represent values embodying transformative change for sustainability; adaptive, enabling learning, experimentation, and reflexivity, to cope with the complexity of transformative change; and pluralist, recognizing different knowledge systems. We argue that only when these four governance approaches are: implemented in conjunction; operationalized in a specific manner; and focused on addressing the indirect drivers underlying sustainability issues, governance becomes transformative.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85111061318

U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.002

M3 - Article

SN - 1877-3435

VL - 53

SP - 20

EP - 28

JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

ER -

Transformative governance of biodiversity: insights for sustainable development

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this