Abstract
This article examines empirical evidence on the use of translational aids from TAP studies over the last two decades and describes a think aloud protocol (TAP) study designed to verify some of these claims. Following a description of methodology used, the results of the study are presented and discussed. Basing on experience gained from the study, a number of methodological issues are then discussed: the use of students as subjects in TAP studies, the use of postgraduate students as co-investigators, as well as advantages and shortcomings of TAP methodology.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 580-596 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Meta |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Keywords
- Comprehension
- Dictionary use students
- Professionals
- TAPs methodology