Abstract
Objective: To investigate the evidence for balloon dilatation of the eustachian tube using a transtympanic approach. Methods: A systematic search of several databases was conducted (using the search terms 'dilation' or 'dilatation', and 'balloon' and 'eustachian tube'). Only studies that used a transtympanic approach for the procedure were included. These studies were then assessed for risk of bias. Results: Three studies were included. Each of these studies was a limited case series, with two performed on human subjects and one on human cadavers. Results of safety and efficacy are conflicting. There is a high risk of bias overall. Conclusion: At present, there is a very narrow evidence base for transtympanic balloon dilatation of the eustachian tube. There are a number of advantages and disadvantages of the technique. Previously identified and theoretical safety concerns will need to be addressed thoroughly in future studies prior to wider clinical use.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 425-430 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Laryngology and Otology |
| Volume | 130 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2016 |
Keywords
- Carotid Artery
- Dilatation
- Ear, Middle
- Eustachian Tube
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Transtympanic balloon dilatation of the eustachian tube: Systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver