Transvaginal mesh, gender and the ethics of clinical innovation

Miriam Wiersma, Ian Kerridge, Wendy Lipworth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

On 10 October 2018, Australian Health Minister Greg Hunt issued a national apology to the Australian women who experienced 'horrific outcomes' following surgery using transvaginal mesh-acknowledging the 'historic agony and pain that has come from mesh implantation'. This apology followed many decades of 'innovative' use of transvaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. We use the case of transvaginal mesh to explore how clinical innovation may not only harm patients, but also entrench vulnerability and exacerbate existing inequities-in this case, those relating to gender.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)523-526
Number of pages4
JournalInternal Medicine Journal
Volume50
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ethics
  • gender
  • innovation
  • patient harm
  • transvaginal mesh

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transvaginal mesh, gender and the ethics of clinical innovation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this