Abstract
Schiffrin 1984 has claimed that there is a speech activity called “sociable argument,” characterized by the presence of discursive features such as vulnerability of argumentative frames and cooperative strategies. Although a form of talk aptly labeled “sociable argument” undoubtedly exists, Schiffrin’s analysis is problematic; the features she identifies as characteristic of this discursive category also show up in argument that is serious and non-sociable. This raises general questions about the nature of the criteria applicable to the definition of forms of talk. (Discourse analysis, argument, conflict, conversation, cooperation, rhetoric)*.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 29-52 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1995 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Troubled Waters: Argument as Sociability Revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver