True to the power of one? Cognition, argument, and reasoning

Drew Michael Khlentzos*, Bruce Stevenson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

While impressed by much of what Mercier & Sperber (M&S) offer through their argumentative hypothesis, we question whether the specific competencies entailed in each system are adequate. In particular, whether system 2 might not require independent reasoning capabilities. We explore the adequacy of the explanations offered for confirmation bias and the Wason selection task.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)82-83
Number of pages2
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'True to the power of one? Cognition, argument, and reasoning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this