Truth, civility, and religious battlegrounds: the contest between religious vilification laws and freedom of expression

Joel Harrison

Truth, civility, and religious battlegrounds

the contest between religious vilification laws and freedom of expression

Joel Harrison

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

The Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001 (Victoria, Australia) and the Canadian Criminal Act are examined through a study of 'Islamic Council of Victoria v Catch the Fire Ministries Inc' and 'R v Harding' cases, respectively. Their provisions that prohibit hate speech based on religious vilification are analyzed, suggesting that freedom of expression should be provided, trusting citizens to employ truth and civility in religious discourse.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	71-96
Number of pages	26
Journal	Auckland University law review
Volume	12
Publication status	Published - 2006
Externally published	Yes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Truth, civility, and religious battlegrounds: the contest between religious vilification laws and freedom of expression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{c50b6d129f944449b7c972a799756c2e,

title = "Truth, civility, and religious battlegrounds: the contest between religious vilification laws and freedom of expression",

abstract = "The Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001 (Victoria, Australia) and the Canadian Criminal Act are examined through a study of 'Islamic Council of Victoria v Catch the Fire Ministries Inc' and 'R v Harding' cases, respectively. Their provisions that prohibit hate speech based on religious vilification are analyzed, suggesting that freedom of expression should be provided, trusting citizens to employ truth and civility in religious discourse.",

author = "Joel Harrison",

year = "2006",

language = "English",

volume = "12",

pages = "71--96",

journal = "Auckland University law review",

issn = "0067-0510",

publisher = "University of Auckland",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Truth, civility, and religious battlegrounds

T2 - the contest between religious vilification laws and freedom of expression

AU - Harrison, Joel

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001 (Victoria, Australia) and the Canadian Criminal Act are examined through a study of 'Islamic Council of Victoria v Catch the Fire Ministries Inc' and 'R v Harding' cases, respectively. Their provisions that prohibit hate speech based on religious vilification are analyzed, suggesting that freedom of expression should be provided, trusting citizens to employ truth and civility in religious discourse.

AB - The Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001 (Victoria, Australia) and the Canadian Criminal Act are examined through a study of 'Islamic Council of Victoria v Catch the Fire Ministries Inc' and 'R v Harding' cases, respectively. Their provisions that prohibit hate speech based on religious vilification are analyzed, suggesting that freedom of expression should be provided, trusting citizens to employ truth and civility in religious discourse.

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 71

EP - 96

JO - Auckland University law review

JF - Auckland University law review

SN - 0067-0510

ER -