TY - JOUR
T1 - Two-country comparison of the prescription of bone protection medication before and early after hip fracture
AU - Halim, Nicole K.
AU - Harris, Roger G.
AU - Cameron, Ian D.
AU - Close, Jacqueline
AU - Harris, Ian A.
AU - Hallen, Jamie
AU - Hurring, Sarah
AU - Ward, Nicola
AU - McDougall, Catherine
AU - Mitchell, Rebecca J.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Summary: Pharmacological management of bone health warrants investigation into factors influencing initiation of bone protection medication (BPM) at discharge after a hip fracture. This sprint audit identified reasons attributed to low BPM treatment levels at hospital discharge which can guide improvement in the prevention of future fractures. Purpose: To compare patient characteristics and Australian and New Zealand approaches to prescribing bone protection medication (BPM) pre- or post-hip fracture, determine reasons why BPM was not prescribed earlier post-fracture, and assess the generalisability of sprint audit and the Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR) patient cohorts. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of hip fracture patients from the ANZHFR aged ≥ 50 years (2016–2020) and consecutive patients from the 2021 BPM sprint audit. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with not prescribing BPM. Results: Of 55,618 patients admitted with a hip fracture in the ANZHFR, less than 10% of patients in Australia and New Zealand were taking BPM on admission, increasing to 22.4% in Australia and 27.8% in New Zealand on discharge. Registry patients who were younger (50–69 years), healthy (ASA grade 1), lived in a residential aged care facility, had impaired cognition, delirium identified, or were awaiting a specialist falls assessment were less likely to take BPM. Within the audit, 46.2% of patients in Australia and 39.2% in New Zealand did not have BPM in their discharge prescription. The most common reason for not prescribing BPM in Australia was low level of vitamin D (13.3%), and in New Zealand, renal impairment (14.8%). Sprint and registry patient characteristics were comparable in terms of patient age, sex, usual place of residence, and ASA grade. Conclusions: BPM prescription early after hip fracture is low. Opportunities exist to increase the rate of prescription of medications known to prevent future fractures in this high-risk population.
AB - Summary: Pharmacological management of bone health warrants investigation into factors influencing initiation of bone protection medication (BPM) at discharge after a hip fracture. This sprint audit identified reasons attributed to low BPM treatment levels at hospital discharge which can guide improvement in the prevention of future fractures. Purpose: To compare patient characteristics and Australian and New Zealand approaches to prescribing bone protection medication (BPM) pre- or post-hip fracture, determine reasons why BPM was not prescribed earlier post-fracture, and assess the generalisability of sprint audit and the Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR) patient cohorts. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of hip fracture patients from the ANZHFR aged ≥ 50 years (2016–2020) and consecutive patients from the 2021 BPM sprint audit. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with not prescribing BPM. Results: Of 55,618 patients admitted with a hip fracture in the ANZHFR, less than 10% of patients in Australia and New Zealand were taking BPM on admission, increasing to 22.4% in Australia and 27.8% in New Zealand on discharge. Registry patients who were younger (50–69 years), healthy (ASA grade 1), lived in a residential aged care facility, had impaired cognition, delirium identified, or were awaiting a specialist falls assessment were less likely to take BPM. Within the audit, 46.2% of patients in Australia and 39.2% in New Zealand did not have BPM in their discharge prescription. The most common reason for not prescribing BPM in Australia was low level of vitamin D (13.3%), and in New Zealand, renal impairment (14.8%). Sprint and registry patient characteristics were comparable in terms of patient age, sex, usual place of residence, and ASA grade. Conclusions: BPM prescription early after hip fracture is low. Opportunities exist to increase the rate of prescription of medications known to prevent future fractures in this high-risk population.
KW - Audit
KW - Bone protection medication
KW - Hip fracture
KW - Osteoporosis
KW - Registry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143693433&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11657-022-01197-4
DO - 10.1007/s11657-022-01197-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 36508017
AN - SCOPUS:85143693433
SN - 1862-3522
VL - 18
SP - 1
EP - 12
JO - Archives of Osteoporosis
JF - Archives of Osteoporosis
IS - 1
M1 - 8
ER -