TY - JOUR
T1 - Two-year efficacy of varenicline tartrate and counselling for inpatient smoking cessation (STOP study)
T2 - a randomized controlled clinical trial
AU - Carson-Chahhoud, Kristin V.
AU - Smith, Brian J.
AU - Peters, Matthew J.
AU - Brinn, Malcolm P.
AU - Ameer, Faisal
AU - Singh, Kuljit
AU - Fitridge, Robert
AU - Litt, John
AU - Edwards, David
AU - Koblar, Simon A.
AU - Jannes, Jim
AU - Veale, Antony J.
AU - Goldsworthy, Sharon
AU - Hnin, Khin
AU - Esterman, Adrian J.
N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2020. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.
A correction exists for this article and can be found in PLoS ONE 16(12): e0262188 at doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262188
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - Introduction Varenicline tartrate is superior for smoking cessation to other tobacco cessation therapies by 52 weeks, in the outpatient setting. We aimed to evaluate the long-term (104 week) efficacy following a standard course of inpatient-initiated varenicline tartrate plus Quitline-counselling compared to Quitline-counselling alone. Methods Adult patients (n = 392, 20–75 years) admitted with a smoking-related illnesses to one of three hospitals, were randomised to receive either 12-weeks of varenicline tartrate (titrated from 0.5mg daily to 1mg twice-daily) plus Quitline-counselling, (n = 196) or Quitline-counselling alone, (n = 196), with continuous abstinence from smoking assessed at 104 weeks. Results A total of 1959 potential participants were screened for eligibility between August 2008 and December 2011. The proportion of participants who remained continuously abstinent (intention-to-treat) at 104 weeks were significantly greater in the varenicline tartrate plus counselling arm (29.2% n = 56) compared to counselling alone (18.8% n = 36; p = 0.02; odds ratio 1.78; 95%CI 1.10 to 2.86, p = 0.02). Twenty-two deaths occurred during the 104 week study (n = 10 for varenicline tartrate plus counselling and n = 12 for Quitline-counselling alone). All of these participants had known or developed underlying co-morbidities. Conclusions This is the first study to examine the efficacy and safety of varenicline tartrate over 104 weeks within any setting. Varenicline tartrate plus Quitline-counselling was found to be an effective opportunistic treatment when initiated for inpatient smokers who had been admitted with tobacco-related disease.
AB - Introduction Varenicline tartrate is superior for smoking cessation to other tobacco cessation therapies by 52 weeks, in the outpatient setting. We aimed to evaluate the long-term (104 week) efficacy following a standard course of inpatient-initiated varenicline tartrate plus Quitline-counselling compared to Quitline-counselling alone. Methods Adult patients (n = 392, 20–75 years) admitted with a smoking-related illnesses to one of three hospitals, were randomised to receive either 12-weeks of varenicline tartrate (titrated from 0.5mg daily to 1mg twice-daily) plus Quitline-counselling, (n = 196) or Quitline-counselling alone, (n = 196), with continuous abstinence from smoking assessed at 104 weeks. Results A total of 1959 potential participants were screened for eligibility between August 2008 and December 2011. The proportion of participants who remained continuously abstinent (intention-to-treat) at 104 weeks were significantly greater in the varenicline tartrate plus counselling arm (29.2% n = 56) compared to counselling alone (18.8% n = 36; p = 0.02; odds ratio 1.78; 95%CI 1.10 to 2.86, p = 0.02). Twenty-two deaths occurred during the 104 week study (n = 10 for varenicline tartrate plus counselling and n = 12 for Quitline-counselling alone). All of these participants had known or developed underlying co-morbidities. Conclusions This is the first study to examine the efficacy and safety of varenicline tartrate over 104 weeks within any setting. Varenicline tartrate plus Quitline-counselling was found to be an effective opportunistic treatment when initiated for inpatient smokers who had been admitted with tobacco-related disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084081772&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122123342&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0231095
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0231095
M3 - Article
C2 - 32348306
AN - SCOPUS:85084081772
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 15
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 4
M1 - e0231095
ER -