Abstract
It is well established that beliefs provide powerful cues that influence reasoning. Over the last decade research has revealed that judgments based upon logical structure may also pre-empt deliberative reasoning. Evidence for ‘intuitive logic’ has been claimed using a range of measures (i.e. confidence ratings or latency of response on conflict problems). However, it is unclear how well such measures genuinely reflect logical intuition. In this paper we introduce a new method designed to test for evidence of intuitive logic. In two experiments participants were asked to make random judgments about the logical validity of a series of simple and complex syllogistic arguments. For simple arguments there was an effect of logical validity on random responding, which was absent for complex arguments. These findings provide a novel demonstration that people are intuitively sensitive to logical structure.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 61-96 |
| Number of pages | 36 |
| Journal | Thinking and Reasoning |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 22 Jun 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2022 |
Keywords
- reasoning
- intuitive logic
- dual process theory
- syllogistic reasoning
- random responding