Under what conditions is mandatory disclosure most likely to cause organisational change?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to reflect on how mandatory sustainability accounts can be designed to maximise the likelihood of moving society towards sustainability.
Design/methodology/approach: The authors use institutional theory to show that organisations are constrained by institutions. Sustainability accounts can drive change by providing information that changes the institutional mix of pressures on organisations.
Findings: Mandatory disclosure is most likely to drive change when: indicators are appropriate for information intermediaries or other intended users; information is provided at the appropriate level of aggregation; data are comparable to external benchmarks and/or other corporations; there exists a linkage to network of other relevant information; and sufficient popular and political support exists.
Practical implications: Social changes will only come about if users receive information relevant to their goals and are able to translate it into political action. Corporate-level reporting may not be the best mechanism for this, because many users are interested in issues-based information. In many instances, due to the ability to facilitate greater comparability, a database mechanism is likely to be more helpful. Social and environmental accounting research should consider adopting more site-based reporting, ascertain what sustainability information governments already collect, determine what information NGOs need for campaigning purposes, and theorise how to create and link a nexus of accounts.
Originality/value: While many studies have called for improved practice and lamented the impotence of reporting, few studies have explored this link from a theoretical perspective.
LanguageEnglish
Pages811-835
Number of pages25
JournalAccounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
Volume32
Issue number3
Early online date2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Mandatory disclosure
Organizational change
Sustainability
Political support
Non-governmental organizations
Institutional theory
Government
Intermediaries
Social accounting
Accounting research
Design methodology
Linkage
Environmental accounting
Data base
Benchmark

Keywords

  • Sustainability reporting
  • Social and environmental accounting
  • Central databases
  • Pollutant release and transfer register

Cite this

@article{410077edcad54d39a703ef8ddf6854b4,
title = "Under what conditions is mandatory disclosure most likely to cause organisational change?",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to reflect on how mandatory sustainability accounts can be designed to maximise the likelihood of moving society towards sustainability.Design/methodology/approach: The authors use institutional theory to show that organisations are constrained by institutions. Sustainability accounts can drive change by providing information that changes the institutional mix of pressures on organisations.Findings: Mandatory disclosure is most likely to drive change when: indicators are appropriate for information intermediaries or other intended users; information is provided at the appropriate level of aggregation; data are comparable to external benchmarks and/or other corporations; there exists a linkage to network of other relevant information; and sufficient popular and political support exists.Practical implications: Social changes will only come about if users receive information relevant to their goals and are able to translate it into political action. Corporate-level reporting may not be the best mechanism for this, because many users are interested in issues-based information. In many instances, due to the ability to facilitate greater comparability, a database mechanism is likely to be more helpful. Social and environmental accounting research should consider adopting more site-based reporting, ascertain what sustainability information governments already collect, determine what information NGOs need for campaigning purposes, and theorise how to create and link a nexus of accounts.Originality/value: While many studies have called for improved practice and lamented the impotence of reporting, few studies have explored this link from a theoretical perspective.",
keywords = "Sustainability reporting, Social and environmental accounting, Central databases, Pollutant release and transfer register",
author = "Shane Leong and James Hazelton",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2361",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "811--835",
journal = "Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal",
issn = "0951-3574",
publisher = "MCB University Press",
number = "3",

}

Under what conditions is mandatory disclosure most likely to cause organisational change? / Leong, Shane; Hazelton, James.

In: Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 32, No. 3, 10.06.2019, p. 811-835.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Under what conditions is mandatory disclosure most likely to cause organisational change?

AU - Leong,Shane

AU - Hazelton,James

PY - 2019/6/10

Y1 - 2019/6/10

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to reflect on how mandatory sustainability accounts can be designed to maximise the likelihood of moving society towards sustainability.Design/methodology/approach: The authors use institutional theory to show that organisations are constrained by institutions. Sustainability accounts can drive change by providing information that changes the institutional mix of pressures on organisations.Findings: Mandatory disclosure is most likely to drive change when: indicators are appropriate for information intermediaries or other intended users; information is provided at the appropriate level of aggregation; data are comparable to external benchmarks and/or other corporations; there exists a linkage to network of other relevant information; and sufficient popular and political support exists.Practical implications: Social changes will only come about if users receive information relevant to their goals and are able to translate it into political action. Corporate-level reporting may not be the best mechanism for this, because many users are interested in issues-based information. In many instances, due to the ability to facilitate greater comparability, a database mechanism is likely to be more helpful. Social and environmental accounting research should consider adopting more site-based reporting, ascertain what sustainability information governments already collect, determine what information NGOs need for campaigning purposes, and theorise how to create and link a nexus of accounts.Originality/value: While many studies have called for improved practice and lamented the impotence of reporting, few studies have explored this link from a theoretical perspective.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to reflect on how mandatory sustainability accounts can be designed to maximise the likelihood of moving society towards sustainability.Design/methodology/approach: The authors use institutional theory to show that organisations are constrained by institutions. Sustainability accounts can drive change by providing information that changes the institutional mix of pressures on organisations.Findings: Mandatory disclosure is most likely to drive change when: indicators are appropriate for information intermediaries or other intended users; information is provided at the appropriate level of aggregation; data are comparable to external benchmarks and/or other corporations; there exists a linkage to network of other relevant information; and sufficient popular and political support exists.Practical implications: Social changes will only come about if users receive information relevant to their goals and are able to translate it into political action. Corporate-level reporting may not be the best mechanism for this, because many users are interested in issues-based information. In many instances, due to the ability to facilitate greater comparability, a database mechanism is likely to be more helpful. Social and environmental accounting research should consider adopting more site-based reporting, ascertain what sustainability information governments already collect, determine what information NGOs need for campaigning purposes, and theorise how to create and link a nexus of accounts.Originality/value: While many studies have called for improved practice and lamented the impotence of reporting, few studies have explored this link from a theoretical perspective.

KW - Sustainability reporting

KW - Social and environmental accounting

KW - Central databases

KW - Pollutant release and transfer register

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066816915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2361

DO - 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2361

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 811

EP - 835

JO - Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal

T2 - Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal

JF - Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal

SN - 0951-3574

IS - 3

ER -