Understanding autistic individuals: cognitive diversity not theoretical deficit

Ines Hipolito*, Daniel D. Hutto, Nick Chown

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This paper challenges the prevalent Mindreading picture of social cognition that promotes the view that the social cognitive profiles of autistic individuals are due to an underlying condition that is best explained in terms of theory-related deficiencies. Section 1 provides background of the current state of thinking that motivates acceptance of mentalising proposals about how to understand and best explain autistic social cognition. Section 2 focuses on old school Mental Module TT proposals, noting their theoretical and explanatory limitations. Section 3 examines new school Bayesian Brain TT proposals, highlighting what has made them theoretically and explanatorily appealing to many researchers. Section 4 concludes by providing a diagnosis of why we should reject any kind of mentalising proposal about what best explains social cognition and the patterns it takes for autistic individuals. The paper closes by encouraging the adoption of alternative, non-Mindreading ways of understanding the social cognitive styles of the general population and autistic individuals.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNeurodiversity studies
Subtitle of host publicationa new critical paradigm
EditorsHanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Nick Chown, Anna Stenning
Place of PublicationLondon ; New York
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francis Group
Chapter12
Pages193-209
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9780429322297
ISBN (Print)9780367338312, 9780367503253
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameRoutledge Advances in Sociology
PublisherRoutledge
Volume285

Keywords

  • mind
  • autism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding autistic individuals: cognitive diversity not theoretical deficit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this