Understanding participation in accounting standard-setting: the case of AASB ED 192 Revised Differential Reporting Framework

Karen Handley*, Elaine Evans, Sue Wright

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper explores the motives of participants in the standard-setting process, based on the premise that standard-setters strive for standards that are useful for decision-making by a wide range of financial statement users. Our setting is the development of a contentious but contained Australian accounting standard, Reduced Disclosure Requirements. A consultative process initiated by the Australian Accounting Standards Board to create a specific Australian accounting standard for differential reporting provided an opportunity for interested parties to participate. We analyse the motives of participants through semi-structured interviews with members of the Australian Accounting Standards Board and comment letter writers who responded to the relevant exposure draft. Our findings identify participants' economic and political motivations and question the ability of the current standard-setting process to extract decision-making requirements from a wide range of users of financial statements and to reflect these in financial reporting standards. We find that the perspectives gathered are homogenised and that the process privileges the voices of powerful elites.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3621-3645
Number of pages25
JournalAccounting & Finance
Volume60
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Keywords

  • Australian Accounting Standards Board
  • Comment letters
  • Consultation
  • Standard-setting

Cite this