Understanding property in Australian history

A. R. Buck

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

In contemporary Australia the topic of land ownership remains a topic of heated debate. In that debate, history itself has become a battleground. On one side, some academic historians have highlighted past injustices towards the indigenous population, who were dispossessed of their land. On the other, conservatives, such as Prime Minister John Howard, have condemned historians for writing what he calls “black armband” history. Rather than acknowledge and apologize for the dispossession of a people and the destruction of a culture, he has argued that it is the ordinary suburban Australians who are made to suffer and feel the guilt for crimes they did not commit, and it is they, not the indigenous population, who deserve compassion. This chapter represents part of that ongoing battle over the interpretation of the past.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe River of history
Subtitle of host publicationtrans-national and trans-disciplinary perspectives on the immanence of the past
EditorsPeter Farrugia
Place of PublicationCalgary, Canada
PublisherUniversity of Calgary Press
Pages125-146
Number of pages22
ISBN (Print)1552381609
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding property in Australian history'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this