Understanding statistical principles in correlation, causation and moderation in human disease

Michael P. Jones, Marjorie M. Walker, John R. Attia

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)


    We are all familiar with the expression “correlation does not imply causation”, but often causation is exactly what we need to determine. For example, one may want to understand whether the use of MP3 players with earbuds causes partial hearing loss, whether holding mobile telephones to the ear causes brain cancer or whether parents’ exposure to toxic chemicals during conception or pregnancy causes birth defects in children. Non-causal risk factors can be useful, but eventually, what we really want to understand is causation. Because the causal connection between exposure to risk factor and disease outcome is often complex or poorly understood, what researchers can truly study is whether an association exists or not. This article explains how we can move from correlation and association to causal interpretation of data, and what statistical evidence is needed to support causal conclusions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)104-106
    Number of pages3
    JournalMedical Journal of Australia
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2017


    Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding statistical principles in correlation, causation and moderation in human disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this