Unsafe health and safety: Sphygmomanometer cuffs are not interchangeable

K. C. Shaw, C. M. McEniery, I. B. Wilkinson, M. J. Brown*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)


    Unknown to its hypertension specialists, a major teaching hospital changed the cuffs on its sphygmomanometers from manufacturer-validated to a uniform washable alternative, in line with 'Health and Safety' concerns surrounding potential cross-contamination between patients. When clinic doctors suspected serious under-reading with the new cuffs, a systematic comparison was undertaken in 54 patients (mean±s.d. age, 61±17 years), using two UM-101 sphygmomanometers, one using the original, manufacturer-supplied cuff and the other with the washable replacement. The study confirmed an average under-reading of 8±10/5±5 mm Hg using the washable cuff, and a third of patients with poorly controlled hypertension were considered normotensive, after using this cuff. The UM-101 sphygmomanometers have now been re-fitted with the original cuffs. Sphygmomanometer cuffs are not interchangeable between devices and a modicum of common sense should be shown to prevent changes made in the name of Health and Safety from having the opposite effect to that intended.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)434-436
    Number of pages3
    JournalJournal of Human Hypertension
    Issue number7
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013


    Dive into the research topics of 'Unsafe health and safety: Sphygmomanometer cuffs are not interchangeable'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this