Update on evidence-based reviews with recommendations in adult chronic rhinosinusitis

Richard R. Orlandi*, Timothy L. Smith, Bradley F. Marple, Richard J. Harvey, Peter H. Hwang, Robert C. Kern, Todd T. Kingdom, Amber Luong, Luke Rudmik, Brent A. Senior, Elina Toskala, David W. Kennedy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)


Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has a significant impact not only on individuals who are afflicted but also on society as a whole. An increasing emphasis is being placed on incorporating the best available evidence into the care of patients, in association with an individual clinician's expertise and the patient's values. Recent evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs) have distilled our knowledge of CRS treatment options and have also pointed out continued gaps in this knowledge. This review synthesizes the findings of 8 EBRRs regarding CRS published in the International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology between 2011 and 2014. The recommendations in this review are based on the best available evidence and are meant to be incorporated into each patient's individual care, along with the practitioner's expertise and the individual patient's values and expectations. It is hoped that the EBRRs, and the process that spawned them, can provide the foundation for future guidelines in the diagnosis and management of CRS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S1-S15
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Forum of Allergy and Rhinology
Issue numberSUPPL.1
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2014
Externally publishedYes


  • Chronic rhinosinusitis
  • CRS
  • EBM
  • EBRR
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Evidence-based review with recommendation


Dive into the research topics of 'Update on evidence-based reviews with recommendations in adult chronic rhinosinusitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this