TY - JOUR
T1 - Updated metal compounds (MOFs, —S, —OH, —N, —C) used as cathode materials for lithium–sulfur batteries
AU - Xu, Jing
AU - Lawson, Tom
AU - Fan, Hongbo
AU - Su, Dawei
AU - Wang, Guoxiu
PY - 2018/4/5
Y1 - 2018/4/5
N2 - Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries have the potential to be as efficient and as widespread as lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, since sulfur electrode has high theoretical capacity (1672 mA h gsul−1) and this element is affordable. However, unlike their ubiquitous lithium ion (Li-ion) counterparts, it is difficult to realize the commercialization of Li-S battery. Because the shuttle effect of polysulfide inevitably results in the serious capacity degradation. Tremendous progress is devoted to approach this problem from the aspect of physical confinement and chemisorption of polysulfide. Owing to weak intermolecular interactions, physical confinement strategy, however is not effective when the battery is cycled long-term. Chemisorption of polysulfide that derived from polar–polar interaction, Lewis acid–base interaction, and sulfur-chain catenation, are proven to significantly suppress the shuttle effect of polysulfide. It is also discovered that the metal compounds have strong chemical interactions with polysulfide. Therefore, this review focuses on latest metal–organic frameworks metal sulfides, metal hydroxides, metal nitrides, metal carbides, and discusses how the chemical interactions couple with the unique properties of these metal compounds to tackle the problem of polysulfide shuttle effect.
AB - Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries have the potential to be as efficient and as widespread as lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, since sulfur electrode has high theoretical capacity (1672 mA h gsul−1) and this element is affordable. However, unlike their ubiquitous lithium ion (Li-ion) counterparts, it is difficult to realize the commercialization of Li-S battery. Because the shuttle effect of polysulfide inevitably results in the serious capacity degradation. Tremendous progress is devoted to approach this problem from the aspect of physical confinement and chemisorption of polysulfide. Owing to weak intermolecular interactions, physical confinement strategy, however is not effective when the battery is cycled long-term. Chemisorption of polysulfide that derived from polar–polar interaction, Lewis acid–base interaction, and sulfur-chain catenation, are proven to significantly suppress the shuttle effect of polysulfide. It is also discovered that the metal compounds have strong chemical interactions with polysulfide. Therefore, this review focuses on latest metal–organic frameworks metal sulfides, metal hydroxides, metal nitrides, metal carbides, and discusses how the chemical interactions couple with the unique properties of these metal compounds to tackle the problem of polysulfide shuttle effect.
KW - metal carbides
KW - metal hydroxides
KW - metal nitrides
KW - metal organic frameworks
KW - metal sulfides
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040702360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE170101009
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP170100436
U2 - 10.1002/aenm.201702607
DO - 10.1002/aenm.201702607
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85040702360
SN - 1614-6832
VL - 8
SP - 1
EP - 23
JO - Advanced Energy Materials
JF - Advanced Energy Materials
IS - 10
M1 - 1702607
ER -