Use of GRADE in Australian clinical practice guidelines: a methodological review protocol

Mafalda M. Dias, Zachary Munn, Kylie Porritt, Catalin Tufanaru, Cindy Stern, Edoardo Aromataris, Rick Wiechula, Sue Brennan, Holger Schünemann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Research question/Objective: The purpose of this methodological review is to determine whether and to what extent GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology has been and is currently being used in Australian clinical practice guidelines.

LanguageEnglish
Pages2092-2096
Number of pages5
JournalJBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports
Volume16
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Practice Guidelines
Research

Keywords

  • Australia
  • clinical
  • GRADE
  • Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation

Cite this

Dias, Mafalda M. ; Munn, Zachary ; Porritt, Kylie ; Tufanaru, Catalin ; Stern, Cindy ; Aromataris, Edoardo ; Wiechula, Rick ; Brennan, Sue ; Schünemann, Holger. / Use of GRADE in Australian clinical practice guidelines : a methodological review protocol. In: JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. 2018 ; Vol. 16, No. 11. pp. 2092-2096.
@article{48ef405366ee4774830f742561a176c3,
title = "Use of GRADE in Australian clinical practice guidelines: a methodological review protocol",
abstract = "Research question/Objective: The purpose of this methodological review is to determine whether and to what extent GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology has been and is currently being used in Australian clinical practice guidelines.",
keywords = "Australia, clinical, GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation",
author = "Dias, {Mafalda M.} and Zachary Munn and Kylie Porritt and Catalin Tufanaru and Cindy Stern and Edoardo Aromataris and Rick Wiechula and Sue Brennan and Holger Sch{\"u}nemann",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003923",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "2092--2096",
journal = "JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports",
issn = "1838-2142",
publisher = "Joanna Briggs Institute",
number = "11",

}

Dias, MM, Munn, Z, Porritt, K, Tufanaru, C, Stern, C, Aromataris, E, Wiechula, R, Brennan, S & Schünemann, H 2018, 'Use of GRADE in Australian clinical practice guidelines: a methodological review protocol', JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 2092-2096. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003923

Use of GRADE in Australian clinical practice guidelines : a methodological review protocol. / Dias, Mafalda M.; Munn, Zachary; Porritt, Kylie; Tufanaru, Catalin; Stern, Cindy; Aromataris, Edoardo; Wiechula, Rick; Brennan, Sue; Schünemann, Holger.

In: JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, Vol. 16, No. 11, 01.11.2018, p. 2092-2096.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of GRADE in Australian clinical practice guidelines

T2 - JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports

AU - Dias, Mafalda M.

AU - Munn, Zachary

AU - Porritt, Kylie

AU - Tufanaru, Catalin

AU - Stern, Cindy

AU - Aromataris, Edoardo

AU - Wiechula, Rick

AU - Brennan, Sue

AU - Schünemann, Holger

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Research question/Objective: The purpose of this methodological review is to determine whether and to what extent GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology has been and is currently being used in Australian clinical practice guidelines.

AB - Research question/Objective: The purpose of this methodological review is to determine whether and to what extent GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology has been and is currently being used in Australian clinical practice guidelines.

KW - Australia

KW - clinical

KW - GRADE

KW - Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056647481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003923

DO - 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003923

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 2092

EP - 2096

JO - JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports

JF - JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports

SN - 1838-2142

IS - 11

ER -