Use of on-line evidence databases by Australian public health practitioners

Armita Adily, Johanna I. Westbrook, Enrico W. Coiera, Jeanette E. Ward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To investigate use of a web-based portal, known as the Clinical Information Access Program (CIAP), and evidence databases in an Australian population health workforce. Methods: Self-administered postal survey of 104 staff in a regional Division of Population Health in Sydney, Australia. The main outcome measures were CIAP use and organization support for CIAP use. Two thirds of the respondents agreed that using CIAP was a legitimate part of their practice. However, half agreed that staff were encouraged to use it. One in five respondents (21%) used CIAP weekly. CIAP use was significantly associated with medical qualification or, among non-medical staff, with having at least a Masters qualification. CIAP use was not associated with occupational category, gender, age, employment status nor years of experience. Use of specific evidence databases such as Cochrane also differed significantly by respondents characteristics. Conclusions: There has been only partial uptake of on-line databases among this population health workforce, particularly according to attainment of relevant postgraduate qualifications. As CIAP is a resource for evidence-based practice, greater effort to increase its use is recommended to ensure population health does not fall behind hospital-based clinicians.

LanguageEnglish
Pages127-136
Number of pages10
JournalInformatics for Health and Social Care
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Public Health
Databases
Health Manpower
Population
Evidence-Based Practice
Health
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Organizations
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

@article{0649a66907454a20b6bde6b355a0eed3,
title = "Use of on-line evidence databases by Australian public health practitioners",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate use of a web-based portal, known as the Clinical Information Access Program (CIAP), and evidence databases in an Australian population health workforce. Methods: Self-administered postal survey of 104 staff in a regional Division of Population Health in Sydney, Australia. The main outcome measures were CIAP use and organization support for CIAP use. Two thirds of the respondents agreed that using CIAP was a legitimate part of their practice. However, half agreed that staff were encouraged to use it. One in five respondents (21{\%}) used CIAP weekly. CIAP use was significantly associated with medical qualification or, among non-medical staff, with having at least a Masters qualification. CIAP use was not associated with occupational category, gender, age, employment status nor years of experience. Use of specific evidence databases such as Cochrane also differed significantly by respondents characteristics. Conclusions: There has been only partial uptake of on-line databases among this population health workforce, particularly according to attainment of relevant postgraduate qualifications. As CIAP is a resource for evidence-based practice, greater effort to increase its use is recommended to ensure population health does not fall behind hospital-based clinicians.",
author = "Armita Adily and Westbrook, {Johanna I.} and Coiera, {Enrico W.} and Ward, {Jeanette E.}",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/14639230410001723437",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "127--136",
journal = "Informatics for Health and Social Care",
issn = "1753-8157",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

Use of on-line evidence databases by Australian public health practitioners. / Adily, Armita; Westbrook, Johanna I.; Coiera, Enrico W.; Ward, Jeanette E.

In: Informatics for Health and Social Care, Vol. 29, No. 2, 06.2004, p. 127-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of on-line evidence databases by Australian public health practitioners

AU - Adily, Armita

AU - Westbrook, Johanna I.

AU - Coiera, Enrico W.

AU - Ward, Jeanette E.

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - Objective: To investigate use of a web-based portal, known as the Clinical Information Access Program (CIAP), and evidence databases in an Australian population health workforce. Methods: Self-administered postal survey of 104 staff in a regional Division of Population Health in Sydney, Australia. The main outcome measures were CIAP use and organization support for CIAP use. Two thirds of the respondents agreed that using CIAP was a legitimate part of their practice. However, half agreed that staff were encouraged to use it. One in five respondents (21%) used CIAP weekly. CIAP use was significantly associated with medical qualification or, among non-medical staff, with having at least a Masters qualification. CIAP use was not associated with occupational category, gender, age, employment status nor years of experience. Use of specific evidence databases such as Cochrane also differed significantly by respondents characteristics. Conclusions: There has been only partial uptake of on-line databases among this population health workforce, particularly according to attainment of relevant postgraduate qualifications. As CIAP is a resource for evidence-based practice, greater effort to increase its use is recommended to ensure population health does not fall behind hospital-based clinicians.

AB - Objective: To investigate use of a web-based portal, known as the Clinical Information Access Program (CIAP), and evidence databases in an Australian population health workforce. Methods: Self-administered postal survey of 104 staff in a regional Division of Population Health in Sydney, Australia. The main outcome measures were CIAP use and organization support for CIAP use. Two thirds of the respondents agreed that using CIAP was a legitimate part of their practice. However, half agreed that staff were encouraged to use it. One in five respondents (21%) used CIAP weekly. CIAP use was significantly associated with medical qualification or, among non-medical staff, with having at least a Masters qualification. CIAP use was not associated with occupational category, gender, age, employment status nor years of experience. Use of specific evidence databases such as Cochrane also differed significantly by respondents characteristics. Conclusions: There has been only partial uptake of on-line databases among this population health workforce, particularly according to attainment of relevant postgraduate qualifications. As CIAP is a resource for evidence-based practice, greater effort to increase its use is recommended to ensure population health does not fall behind hospital-based clinicians.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860419970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14639230410001723437

DO - 10.1080/14639230410001723437

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 127

EP - 136

JO - Informatics for Health and Social Care

T2 - Informatics for Health and Social Care

JF - Informatics for Health and Social Care

SN - 1753-8157

IS - 2

ER -