Views of health journalists, industry employees and news consumers about disclosure and regulation of industry-journalist relationships

an empirical ethical study

Wendy Lipworth, Ian Kerridge, Bronwen Morrell, Rowena Forsyth, Christopher F C Jordens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bioethicists and policymakers are increasingly concerned about the effects on health journalism of relationships between journalists and private corporations. The concern is that relationships between journalists and manufacturers of medicines, medical devices, complementary medicines and food can and do distort health reporting. This is a problem because health news is known to have a major impact on the public's health-related expectations and behaviour. Commentators have proposed two related approaches to protecting the public from potential harms arising from industry-journalist interactions: greater transparency and external regulation. To date, few empirical studies have examined stakeholders' views of industry-journalist relationships and how these should be managed. We conducted interviews with 13 journalists and 12 industry employees, and 2 focus groups with consumers. Our findings, which are synthesised here, provide empirical support for the need for greater transparency and regulation of industry-journalist relationships. Our findings also highlight several likely barriers to instituting such measures, which will need to be overcome if transparency and regulation are to be accepted by stakeholders and have their intended effect on the quality of journalism and the actions of news consumers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)252-257
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Views of health journalists, industry employees and news consumers about disclosure and regulation of industry-journalist relationships: an empirical ethical study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this