Virtue epistemology and epistemic luck, revisited

Duncan Pritchard*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)


In this article I return to an argument that I presented in earlier work to the effect that virtue epistemology is at worse false and at best unmotivated. In the light of recent responses to this argument from such figures as John Greco, Guy Axtell, and Kelly Becker, I here re-state and re-evaluate this argument. In the process the original argument is refined and supplemented in key respects and some of the main charges against it are shown to be unfounded. Nevertheless, I also argue that at least one of the objections to the original argument - due to Becker - may well be on the right lines, and I draw some conclusions in this regard.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-88
Number of pages23
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes


  • Epistemology
  • Luck
  • Reliabilism
  • Virtue


Dive into the research topics of 'Virtue epistemology and epistemic luck, revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this