Visual experience and motor action

Are the bonds too tight

Andy Clark*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

108 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How should we characterize the functional role of conscious visual experience? In particular, how do the conscious contents of visual experience guide, bear upon, or otherwise inform our ongoing motor activities? According to an intuitive and (I shall argue) philosophically influential conception, the links are often quite direct. The contents of conscious visual experience, according to this conception, are typically active in the control and guidance of our fine-tuned, real-time engagements with the surrounding three-dimensional world. But this idea (which I shall call the Assumption of Experience-Based Control) is hostage to empirical fortune. It is a hostage, moreover, whose safety is in serious doubt. Thus Milner and Goodale (1995) argue for a deep and abiding dissociation between the contents of conscious seeing, on the one hand, and the resources used for the online guidance of visuo- motor action, on the other. This "dual visual systems" hypothesis, which finds many echoes in various other bodies of cognitive scientific research, poses a prima facie challenge to the Assumption of Experience-Based Control. More importantly, it provides (I shall argue) fuel for an alternative and philosophically suggestive account of the functional role of conscious visual experience.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)495-519
Number of pages25
JournalPhilosophical Review
Volume110
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Visual experience and motor action: Are the bonds too tight'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this