TY - JOUR
T1 - Visual speech processing
T2 - Word‐decoding and word‐discrimination related to sentence‐based speechreading and hearing‐impairment
AU - LYXELL, BJÖRN
AU - RÖNNBERG, JERKER
PY - 1991
Y1 - 1991
N2 - Two aspects of visual speech processing in speechreading (word decoding and word discrimination) were tested in a group of 24 normal hearing and a group of 20 hearing‐impaired subjects. Word decoding and word discrimination performance were independent of factors related to the impairment, both in a quantitative and a qualitative sense. Decoding skill, but not discrimination skill, was associated with sentence‐based speechreading. The results were interpreted such that, in order to represent a critical component process in sentence‐based speechreading, the visual speech perception task must entail lexically induced processing as a task‐demand. The theoretical status of the word decoding task as one operationalization of a speech decoding module was discussed (Fodor, 1983). An error analysis of performance in the word decoding/discrimination tasks suggested that the perception of heard stimuli, as well as the perception of lipped stimuli, were critically dependent on the same features; that is, the temporally initial phonetic segment of the word (cf. Marslen‐Wilson, 1987). Implications for a theory of visual speech perception were discussed.
AB - Two aspects of visual speech processing in speechreading (word decoding and word discrimination) were tested in a group of 24 normal hearing and a group of 20 hearing‐impaired subjects. Word decoding and word discrimination performance were independent of factors related to the impairment, both in a quantitative and a qualitative sense. Decoding skill, but not discrimination skill, was associated with sentence‐based speechreading. The results were interpreted such that, in order to represent a critical component process in sentence‐based speechreading, the visual speech perception task must entail lexically induced processing as a task‐demand. The theoretical status of the word decoding task as one operationalization of a speech decoding module was discussed (Fodor, 1983). An error analysis of performance in the word decoding/discrimination tasks suggested that the perception of heard stimuli, as well as the perception of lipped stimuli, were critically dependent on the same features; that is, the temporally initial phonetic segment of the word (cf. Marslen‐Wilson, 1987). Implications for a theory of visual speech perception were discussed.
KW - hearing‐impairment
KW - speech‐reading
KW - Word‐decoding
KW - word‐discrimination
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026084412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1991.tb00847.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1991.tb00847.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 2047800
AN - SCOPUS:0026084412
SN - 0036-5564
VL - 32
SP - 9
EP - 17
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
IS - 1
ER -