Vulnerability and resilience: a critical nexus

Mianna Lotz*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)


Not all forms of human fragility or vulnerability are unavoidable. Sometimes we knowingly and intentionally impose conditions of vulnerability on others; and sometimes we knowingly and intentionally enter into and assume conditions of vulnerability for ourselves (for example, when we decide to trust or forgive, enter into intimate relationships with others, become a parent, become a subject of medical or psychotherapeutic treatment, and the like). In this article, I propose a presently overlooked basis on which one might evaluate whether the imposition or assumption of vulnerability is acceptable, and on which one might ground a significant class of vulnerability-related obligations. Distinct from existing accounts of the importance of promoting autonomy in conditions of vulnerability, this article offers a preliminary exploration of the nature, role, and importance of resilience promotion, its relationship to autonomy promotion, and its prospects for improving human wellbeing in autonomy inhibiting conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-59
Number of pages15
JournalTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016


  • Autonomy
  • Moral obligation
  • Resilience
  • Vulnerability


Dive into the research topics of 'Vulnerability and resilience: a critical nexus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this