TY - GEN
T1 - Weighted Hausdorff distance loss as a function of different metrics in convolutional neural networks for ladybird beetle detection
AU - Vega, Mateo
AU - Benítez, Diego S.
AU - Pérez, Noel
AU - Riofrío, Daniel
AU - Ramón, Giovani
AU - Cisneros-Heredia, Diego
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This work compares five different distance metrics (i.e., Euclidean, Chebyshev, Manhattan, Mahalanobis, and Canberra) implemented in the weighted Hausdorff distance (WHD) as part of the loss function during the training and validation of a fully convolutional neural network (FCNN) model for detecting ladybird beetle specimens. The FCNN-based detector was trained and validated using a ten-fold cross-validation method on a database composed of 2,633 wildlife images with ladybird beetles. The obtained results highlighted the Chebyshev metric as the top performer given a diverse dataset as ours. This metric scored the highest values in three out of four validation metrics (i.e., precision, recall, and F1-score). The nature of this metric allows substantial space for minimizing the cost function along the FCNN training step. Euclidean and Manhattan distances also provide good performance based on our validation metrics, while Mahalanobis and Canberra distances are not suitable for detecting of ladybird beetles.
AB - This work compares five different distance metrics (i.e., Euclidean, Chebyshev, Manhattan, Mahalanobis, and Canberra) implemented in the weighted Hausdorff distance (WHD) as part of the loss function during the training and validation of a fully convolutional neural network (FCNN) model for detecting ladybird beetle specimens. The FCNN-based detector was trained and validated using a ten-fold cross-validation method on a database composed of 2,633 wildlife images with ladybird beetles. The obtained results highlighted the Chebyshev metric as the top performer given a diverse dataset as ours. This metric scored the highest values in three out of four validation metrics (i.e., precision, recall, and F1-score). The nature of this metric allows substantial space for minimizing the cost function along the FCNN training step. Euclidean and Manhattan distances also provide good performance based on our validation metrics, while Mahalanobis and Canberra distances are not suitable for detecting of ladybird beetles.
KW - Ladybird beetle detection
KW - Deep learning
KW - Fully convolutional neural network
KW - Weighted Hausdorff distance
KW - Heat map
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126244072&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-91308-3_5
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-91308-3_5
M3 - Conference proceeding contribution
SN - 9783030913076
T3 - Communications in Computer and Information Science
SP - 65
EP - 77
BT - Applications of Computational Intelligence
A2 - Orjuela-Cañón, Alvaro David
A2 - Arias-Londoño, Julián David
A2 - Lopez, Jesus A.
A2 - Figueroa-García, Juan Carlos
PB - Springer, Springer Nature
CY - Cham, Switzerland
T2 - IEEE Colombian Conference on Applications of Computational Intelligence (IEEE ColCACI)
Y2 - 26 May 2021 through 28 May 2021
ER -