Welfare Programme Participation and the Wellbeing of Non-local Rural Migrants in Metropolitan China: A Social Exclusion Perspective

Yeqing Huang, Fei Guo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

China has seen an unprecedented increase in rural-to-urban migrants in the last three decades, and the extension of welfare programmes to these migrants has been a public concern in urban society. The wellbeing of rural-to-urban migrants is closely associated with their access to various welfare programmes. Although pilot reforms on social insurance extension, which often require co-contribution from both employers and employees, have been implemented in several cities, the participation rate remains low. Participation in non-contributory welfare programmes is closely related to the hukou status, which is also undergoing reform. From a social exclusion perspective, this paper examines the critical issues in China’s welfare reforms in relation to the wellbeing of rural to urban migrants. Using qualitative data on welfare programme participation on both institutional and individual levels, this paper argues that the trends of welfare marketization and decentralization lead the welfare provision system to be more selective than universal. This welfare selectivity helps rural migrants with higher economic status become integrated into urban society and enjoy a sense of belonging in cities, while also creating a dual exclusion for rural migrant workers who are disadvantaged in the urban labour market. Individual-level factors, including employment selectivity, information obtainment, settlement intention, and confidence in future reform, influence the choice to participate in welfare programmes. This paper calls for an increased centralization in welfare system reforms.

LanguageEnglish
Pages63-85
Number of pages23
JournalSocial Indicators Research
Volume132
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017

Fingerprint

China
exclusion
migrant
welfare
participation
reform
Social Security
Vulnerable Populations
Politics
Migrants
Well-being
Social Exclusion
Participation
Metropolitan
Economics
social insurance
migrant worker
centralization
decentralization
employer

Keywords

  • China
  • Decentralization
  • Marketization
  • Rural-to-urban migrants
  • Social exclusion
  • Welfare programme participation

Cite this

@article{9f9a6a520c334e83a5c4fb30f0f5a754,
title = "Welfare Programme Participation and the Wellbeing of Non-local Rural Migrants in Metropolitan China: A Social Exclusion Perspective",
abstract = "China has seen an unprecedented increase in rural-to-urban migrants in the last three decades, and the extension of welfare programmes to these migrants has been a public concern in urban society. The wellbeing of rural-to-urban migrants is closely associated with their access to various welfare programmes. Although pilot reforms on social insurance extension, which often require co-contribution from both employers and employees, have been implemented in several cities, the participation rate remains low. Participation in non-contributory welfare programmes is closely related to the hukou status, which is also undergoing reform. From a social exclusion perspective, this paper examines the critical issues in China’s welfare reforms in relation to the wellbeing of rural to urban migrants. Using qualitative data on welfare programme participation on both institutional and individual levels, this paper argues that the trends of welfare marketization and decentralization lead the welfare provision system to be more selective than universal. This welfare selectivity helps rural migrants with higher economic status become integrated into urban society and enjoy a sense of belonging in cities, while also creating a dual exclusion for rural migrant workers who are disadvantaged in the urban labour market. Individual-level factors, including employment selectivity, information obtainment, settlement intention, and confidence in future reform, influence the choice to participate in welfare programmes. This paper calls for an increased centralization in welfare system reforms.",
keywords = "China, Decentralization, Marketization, Rural-to-urban migrants, Social exclusion, Welfare programme participation",
author = "Yeqing Huang and Fei Guo",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11205-016-1329-y",
language = "English",
volume = "132",
pages = "63--85",
journal = "Social Indicators Research",
issn = "0303-8300",
publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",
number = "1",

}

Welfare Programme Participation and the Wellbeing of Non-local Rural Migrants in Metropolitan China : A Social Exclusion Perspective. / Huang, Yeqing; Guo, Fei.

In: Social Indicators Research, Vol. 132, No. 1, 01.05.2017, p. 63-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Welfare Programme Participation and the Wellbeing of Non-local Rural Migrants in Metropolitan China

T2 - Social Indicators Research

AU - Huang, Yeqing

AU - Guo, Fei

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - China has seen an unprecedented increase in rural-to-urban migrants in the last three decades, and the extension of welfare programmes to these migrants has been a public concern in urban society. The wellbeing of rural-to-urban migrants is closely associated with their access to various welfare programmes. Although pilot reforms on social insurance extension, which often require co-contribution from both employers and employees, have been implemented in several cities, the participation rate remains low. Participation in non-contributory welfare programmes is closely related to the hukou status, which is also undergoing reform. From a social exclusion perspective, this paper examines the critical issues in China’s welfare reforms in relation to the wellbeing of rural to urban migrants. Using qualitative data on welfare programme participation on both institutional and individual levels, this paper argues that the trends of welfare marketization and decentralization lead the welfare provision system to be more selective than universal. This welfare selectivity helps rural migrants with higher economic status become integrated into urban society and enjoy a sense of belonging in cities, while also creating a dual exclusion for rural migrant workers who are disadvantaged in the urban labour market. Individual-level factors, including employment selectivity, information obtainment, settlement intention, and confidence in future reform, influence the choice to participate in welfare programmes. This paper calls for an increased centralization in welfare system reforms.

AB - China has seen an unprecedented increase in rural-to-urban migrants in the last three decades, and the extension of welfare programmes to these migrants has been a public concern in urban society. The wellbeing of rural-to-urban migrants is closely associated with their access to various welfare programmes. Although pilot reforms on social insurance extension, which often require co-contribution from both employers and employees, have been implemented in several cities, the participation rate remains low. Participation in non-contributory welfare programmes is closely related to the hukou status, which is also undergoing reform. From a social exclusion perspective, this paper examines the critical issues in China’s welfare reforms in relation to the wellbeing of rural to urban migrants. Using qualitative data on welfare programme participation on both institutional and individual levels, this paper argues that the trends of welfare marketization and decentralization lead the welfare provision system to be more selective than universal. This welfare selectivity helps rural migrants with higher economic status become integrated into urban society and enjoy a sense of belonging in cities, while also creating a dual exclusion for rural migrant workers who are disadvantaged in the urban labour market. Individual-level factors, including employment selectivity, information obtainment, settlement intention, and confidence in future reform, influence the choice to participate in welfare programmes. This paper calls for an increased centralization in welfare system reforms.

KW - China

KW - Decentralization

KW - Marketization

KW - Rural-to-urban migrants

KW - Social exclusion

KW - Welfare programme participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965074953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11205-016-1329-y

DO - 10.1007/s11205-016-1329-y

M3 - Article

VL - 132

SP - 63

EP - 85

JO - Social Indicators Research

JF - Social Indicators Research

SN - 0303-8300

IS - 1

ER -