What Counts in Social Managed Investments

Evidence from an International Survey

Matthew Haigh

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Despite speculation from legislators and practitioners, no studies have investigated the reasons for social funds' marginal market penetration. More generally, calls for a greater understanding of investors' motivations, needs and purchasing intentions have not been met. By identifying what attracts consumers to social mutual funds and the information-processing difficulties consumers face when considering a purchase, this paper claims to make a meaningful contribution to the literature on social investment and mutual funds. In 2004 an Internet questionnaire survey attracted 382 interested, current and former social investors from Australasia, North America and Europe. The questionnaire measured motivations to invest in social funds and attitudes towards information sources and selection criteria. A restricted data set was used to test a set of propositions relating to respondents' investment intentions and information asymmetries. Results were largely as expected. Respondents were attracted to social funds from moral conviction and from desires to influence corporate behavior. One in two respondents had chosen not to invest on the basis of informational concerns. Unexpectedly, social investment styles, portfolio listings and perceived accuracy of information were considered more important to an investment decision than management expenses. Findings underline a need for careful product design and management.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationEnvisioning a New Accountability
    Pages35-62
    Number of pages28
    Volume13
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Publication series

    NameAdvances in Public Interest Accounting
    Volume13
    ISSN (Print)10417060

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'What Counts in Social Managed Investments: Evidence from an International Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this