What does the CRT measure? Poor performance may arise from rational processes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)
    87 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The Cognitive Reflection Test is a widely used measure of the degree to which individuals override an intuitive response and engage in reflection. For both theoretical and practical reasons, it is widely taken to assess an important component of rational thought. In this paper, I will argue that while doing well on the CRT requires valuable cognitive capacities and dispositions, doing badly does not always indicate a lack of such capacities and dispositions. The CRT, I argue, offers respondents implicit (but misleading) testimony: some of those who do badly do so due to a stronger disposition to defer to testimony. Since deference is not irrational, those who do badly need not be irrational, not even in part.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)58-84
    Number of pages27
    JournalPhilosophical Psychology
    Volume36
    Issue number1
    Early online date12 Feb 2022
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2023

    Bibliographical note

    Copyright the Author(s) 2022. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

    Keywords

    • cognitive reflection test
    • deference
    • rationality
    • testimony

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What does the CRT measure? Poor performance may arise from rational processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this