What factors are associated with the integration of evidence retrieval technology into routine general practice settings?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Information retrieval systems have the potential to improve patient care but little is known about the variables which influence clinicians' uptake and use of systems in routine work. Aim: To determine which factors influenced use of an online evidence retrieval system. Design of study: Computer logs and pre- and post-system survey analysis of a 4-week clinical trial of the Quick Clinical online evidence system involving 227 general practitioners across Australia. Results: Online evidence use was not linked to general practice training or clinical experience but female clinicians conducted more searches than their male counterparts (mean use = 14.38 searches, S.D. = 11.68 versus mean use = 8.50 searches, S.D. = 9.99; t = 2.67, d.f. = 157, P = 0.008). Practice characteristics such as hours worked, type and geographic location of clinic were not associated with search activity. Information seeking was also not related to participants' perceived information needs, computer skills, training nor Internet connection speed. Clinicians who reported direct improvements in patient care as a result of system use had significantly higher rates of system use than other users (mean use = 12.55 searches, S.D. = 13.18 versus mean use = 8.15 searches, S.D. = 9.18; t = 2.322, d.f. = 154 P = 0.022). Comparison of participants' views pre- and post- the trial, showed that post-trial clinicians expressed more positive views about searching for information during a consultation (χ2 = 27.40, d.f. = 4, P ≤ 0.001) and a significantly greater number reported seeking information between consultations as a result of having access to an online evidence system in their consulting rooms (χ2 = 9.818, d.f. = 2, P = 0.010). Conclusion: Clinicians' use of an online evidence system was directly related to their reported experiences of improvements in patient care. Post-trial clinicians positively changed their views about having time to search for information and pursued more questions during clinic hours.

LanguageEnglish
Pages701-709
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume76
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Online Systems
General Practice
Patient Care
Technology
Referral and Consultation
Geographic Locations
Information Systems
Internet
General Practitioners
Clinical Trials

Cite this

@article{70f4fe50dafa4774bbc1cdca8fe1cbaa,
title = "What factors are associated with the integration of evidence retrieval technology into routine general practice settings?",
abstract = "Background: Information retrieval systems have the potential to improve patient care but little is known about the variables which influence clinicians' uptake and use of systems in routine work. Aim: To determine which factors influenced use of an online evidence retrieval system. Design of study: Computer logs and pre- and post-system survey analysis of a 4-week clinical trial of the Quick Clinical online evidence system involving 227 general practitioners across Australia. Results: Online evidence use was not linked to general practice training or clinical experience but female clinicians conducted more searches than their male counterparts (mean use = 14.38 searches, S.D. = 11.68 versus mean use = 8.50 searches, S.D. = 9.99; t = 2.67, d.f. = 157, P = 0.008). Practice characteristics such as hours worked, type and geographic location of clinic were not associated with search activity. Information seeking was also not related to participants' perceived information needs, computer skills, training nor Internet connection speed. Clinicians who reported direct improvements in patient care as a result of system use had significantly higher rates of system use than other users (mean use = 12.55 searches, S.D. = 13.18 versus mean use = 8.15 searches, S.D. = 9.18; t = 2.322, d.f. = 154 P = 0.022). Comparison of participants' views pre- and post- the trial, showed that post-trial clinicians expressed more positive views about searching for information during a consultation (χ2 = 27.40, d.f. = 4, P ≤ 0.001) and a significantly greater number reported seeking information between consultations as a result of having access to an online evidence system in their consulting rooms (χ2 = 9.818, d.f. = 2, P = 0.010). Conclusion: Clinicians' use of an online evidence system was directly related to their reported experiences of improvements in patient care. Post-trial clinicians positively changed their views about having time to search for information and pursued more questions during clinic hours.",
author = "Farah Magrabi and Westbrook, {Johanna I.} and Coiera, {Enrico W.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.009",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "701--709",
journal = "International Journal of Medical Informatics",
issn = "1386-5056",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What factors are associated with the integration of evidence retrieval technology into routine general practice settings?

AU - Magrabi, Farah

AU - Westbrook, Johanna I.

AU - Coiera, Enrico W.

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - Background: Information retrieval systems have the potential to improve patient care but little is known about the variables which influence clinicians' uptake and use of systems in routine work. Aim: To determine which factors influenced use of an online evidence retrieval system. Design of study: Computer logs and pre- and post-system survey analysis of a 4-week clinical trial of the Quick Clinical online evidence system involving 227 general practitioners across Australia. Results: Online evidence use was not linked to general practice training or clinical experience but female clinicians conducted more searches than their male counterparts (mean use = 14.38 searches, S.D. = 11.68 versus mean use = 8.50 searches, S.D. = 9.99; t = 2.67, d.f. = 157, P = 0.008). Practice characteristics such as hours worked, type and geographic location of clinic were not associated with search activity. Information seeking was also not related to participants' perceived information needs, computer skills, training nor Internet connection speed. Clinicians who reported direct improvements in patient care as a result of system use had significantly higher rates of system use than other users (mean use = 12.55 searches, S.D. = 13.18 versus mean use = 8.15 searches, S.D. = 9.18; t = 2.322, d.f. = 154 P = 0.022). Comparison of participants' views pre- and post- the trial, showed that post-trial clinicians expressed more positive views about searching for information during a consultation (χ2 = 27.40, d.f. = 4, P ≤ 0.001) and a significantly greater number reported seeking information between consultations as a result of having access to an online evidence system in their consulting rooms (χ2 = 9.818, d.f. = 2, P = 0.010). Conclusion: Clinicians' use of an online evidence system was directly related to their reported experiences of improvements in patient care. Post-trial clinicians positively changed their views about having time to search for information and pursued more questions during clinic hours.

AB - Background: Information retrieval systems have the potential to improve patient care but little is known about the variables which influence clinicians' uptake and use of systems in routine work. Aim: To determine which factors influenced use of an online evidence retrieval system. Design of study: Computer logs and pre- and post-system survey analysis of a 4-week clinical trial of the Quick Clinical online evidence system involving 227 general practitioners across Australia. Results: Online evidence use was not linked to general practice training or clinical experience but female clinicians conducted more searches than their male counterparts (mean use = 14.38 searches, S.D. = 11.68 versus mean use = 8.50 searches, S.D. = 9.99; t = 2.67, d.f. = 157, P = 0.008). Practice characteristics such as hours worked, type and geographic location of clinic were not associated with search activity. Information seeking was also not related to participants' perceived information needs, computer skills, training nor Internet connection speed. Clinicians who reported direct improvements in patient care as a result of system use had significantly higher rates of system use than other users (mean use = 12.55 searches, S.D. = 13.18 versus mean use = 8.15 searches, S.D. = 9.18; t = 2.322, d.f. = 154 P = 0.022). Comparison of participants' views pre- and post- the trial, showed that post-trial clinicians expressed more positive views about searching for information during a consultation (χ2 = 27.40, d.f. = 4, P ≤ 0.001) and a significantly greater number reported seeking information between consultations as a result of having access to an online evidence system in their consulting rooms (χ2 = 9.818, d.f. = 2, P = 0.010). Conclusion: Clinicians' use of an online evidence system was directly related to their reported experiences of improvements in patient care. Post-trial clinicians positively changed their views about having time to search for information and pursued more questions during clinic hours.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45849137878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.009

DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.009

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 701

EP - 709

JO - International Journal of Medical Informatics

T2 - International Journal of Medical Informatics

JF - International Journal of Medical Informatics

SN - 1386-5056

IS - 10

ER -