What happens when things go wrong? Retail sales explanations and their effects

Jarrad Dunning, Anthony Pecotich, Aron O'Cass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Not all marketplace interactions are initially successful, and often customer expectations are not met, resulting in dissatisfaction, which leads to complaint and redress-seeking behavior. In this process, the nature of the explanations and other aspects of the firm-customer interaction are critical. This study investigates the proposition that explanation adequacy plays a critical role in the resolution of unsatisfactory sales encounters. Data were collected from a sample of consumers and analyzed with the use of structural-equation modeling. The findings indicate that explanation adequacy is influenced by the style and content of the explanation and the timeliness of an organization's reaction. However, explanation adequacy appears to only influence the final perceptions (indirectly) of the severity of the incident and emotional reaction to it, and the perceptions of the extent of the justice of the resolution and the assignment of blame to external factors were found to be intervening variables. The results also indicated that the assignment of blame to internal factors was unrelated to the adequacy of an explanation, but did influence emotional reactions and the perceived severity of the incident.

LanguageEnglish
Pages553-572
Number of pages20
JournalPsychology and Marketing
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Organizations
Adequacy
Retail
Incidents
Severity
Assignment
Emotion
Interaction

Cite this

Dunning, Jarrad ; Pecotich, Anthony ; O'Cass, Aron. / What happens when things go wrong? Retail sales explanations and their effects. In: Psychology and Marketing. 2004 ; Vol. 21, No. 7. pp. 553-572.
@article{70079f134040424d98ecedbd6ab3e155,
title = "What happens when things go wrong? Retail sales explanations and their effects",
abstract = "Not all marketplace interactions are initially successful, and often customer expectations are not met, resulting in dissatisfaction, which leads to complaint and redress-seeking behavior. In this process, the nature of the explanations and other aspects of the firm-customer interaction are critical. This study investigates the proposition that explanation adequacy plays a critical role in the resolution of unsatisfactory sales encounters. Data were collected from a sample of consumers and analyzed with the use of structural-equation modeling. The findings indicate that explanation adequacy is influenced by the style and content of the explanation and the timeliness of an organization's reaction. However, explanation adequacy appears to only influence the final perceptions (indirectly) of the severity of the incident and emotional reaction to it, and the perceptions of the extent of the justice of the resolution and the assignment of blame to external factors were found to be intervening variables. The results also indicated that the assignment of blame to internal factors was unrelated to the adequacy of an explanation, but did influence emotional reactions and the perceived severity of the incident.",
author = "Jarrad Dunning and Anthony Pecotich and Aron O'Cass",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/mar.20019",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "553--572",
journal = "Psychology and Marketing",
issn = "0742-6046",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss, Wiley",
number = "7",

}

What happens when things go wrong? Retail sales explanations and their effects. / Dunning, Jarrad; Pecotich, Anthony; O'Cass, Aron.

In: Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 21, No. 7, 07.2004, p. 553-572.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What happens when things go wrong? Retail sales explanations and their effects

AU - Dunning, Jarrad

AU - Pecotich, Anthony

AU - O'Cass, Aron

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - Not all marketplace interactions are initially successful, and often customer expectations are not met, resulting in dissatisfaction, which leads to complaint and redress-seeking behavior. In this process, the nature of the explanations and other aspects of the firm-customer interaction are critical. This study investigates the proposition that explanation adequacy plays a critical role in the resolution of unsatisfactory sales encounters. Data were collected from a sample of consumers and analyzed with the use of structural-equation modeling. The findings indicate that explanation adequacy is influenced by the style and content of the explanation and the timeliness of an organization's reaction. However, explanation adequacy appears to only influence the final perceptions (indirectly) of the severity of the incident and emotional reaction to it, and the perceptions of the extent of the justice of the resolution and the assignment of blame to external factors were found to be intervening variables. The results also indicated that the assignment of blame to internal factors was unrelated to the adequacy of an explanation, but did influence emotional reactions and the perceived severity of the incident.

AB - Not all marketplace interactions are initially successful, and often customer expectations are not met, resulting in dissatisfaction, which leads to complaint and redress-seeking behavior. In this process, the nature of the explanations and other aspects of the firm-customer interaction are critical. This study investigates the proposition that explanation adequacy plays a critical role in the resolution of unsatisfactory sales encounters. Data were collected from a sample of consumers and analyzed with the use of structural-equation modeling. The findings indicate that explanation adequacy is influenced by the style and content of the explanation and the timeliness of an organization's reaction. However, explanation adequacy appears to only influence the final perceptions (indirectly) of the severity of the incident and emotional reaction to it, and the perceptions of the extent of the justice of the resolution and the assignment of blame to external factors were found to be intervening variables. The results also indicated that the assignment of blame to internal factors was unrelated to the adequacy of an explanation, but did influence emotional reactions and the perceived severity of the incident.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042609732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mar.20019

DO - 10.1002/mar.20019

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 553

EP - 572

JO - Psychology and Marketing

T2 - Psychology and Marketing

JF - Psychology and Marketing

SN - 0742-6046

IS - 7

ER -