What is and isn't to be defended as British politics: Whose past, whose present, and whose future? A comment on Kerr and Kettell

Ron Johnston

doi:10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200027

What is and isn't to be defended as British politics: Whose past, whose present, and whose future? A comment on Kerr and Kettell

Ron Johnston^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Faculty of Science and Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A response to an essay by Kerr and Kettell on British politics, identifying a major lacuna in their coverage and their deployment of the politics of silence to marginalise a particular type of theory and its associated empirical work.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	413-418
Number of pages	6
Journal	British Politics
Volume	1
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200027
Publication status	Published - 2006

Keywords

Elections
Psephology
Theory
Theory wars

Access to Document

10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200027

Cite this

@article{0d6a71446e6047579b1ff2449d99dd82,

title = "What is and isn't to be defended as British politics: Whose past, whose present, and whose future? A comment on Kerr and Kettell",

abstract = "A response to an essay by Kerr and Kettell on British politics, identifying a major lacuna in their coverage and their deployment of the politics of silence to marginalise a particular type of theory and its associated empirical work.",

keywords = "Elections, Psephology, Theory, Theory wars",

author = "Ron Johnston",

year = "2006",

doi = "10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200027",

language = "English",

volume = "1",

pages = "413--418",

journal = "British Politics",

issn = "1746-918X",

publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is and isn't to be defended as British politics

T2 - Whose past, whose present, and whose future? A comment on Kerr and Kettell

AU - Johnston, Ron

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - A response to an essay by Kerr and Kettell on British politics, identifying a major lacuna in their coverage and their deployment of the politics of silence to marginalise a particular type of theory and its associated empirical work.

AB - A response to an essay by Kerr and Kettell on British politics, identifying a major lacuna in their coverage and their deployment of the politics of silence to marginalise a particular type of theory and its associated empirical work.

KW - Elections

KW - Psephology

KW - Theory

KW - Theory wars

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51249137569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200027

DO - 10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200027

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:51249137569

SN - 1746-918X

VL - 1

SP - 413

EP - 418

JO - British Politics

JF - British Politics

IS - 3

ER -

What is and isn't to be defended as British politics: Whose past, whose present, and whose future? A comment on Kerr and Kettell

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this