When to walk away: the effect of variability on keeping options viable

Anastasia Ejova, Daniel J. Navarro, Amy F. Perfors

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding contributionpeer-review

Abstract

In this work we explore a variant of a classic explore/exploit dilemma based on a recent study by Shin and Ariely (2004). We presented participants with a scenario in which they were forced to explore among 9 different options of unknown value; for some, options left unexplored long enough disappeared. Contrary to expectations, the mere presence of additional options did not substantially increase people’s ability to walk away from them. However, when options differed in value, people were able to locate the more valuable options and became much more willing to walk away from at least a few. Finally, our analysis of individual differences revealed that while people differ greatly in the strategies they approach the task with, almost every participant showed an “explore to exploit” shift over time.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci2009)
EditorsNiels Taatgen, Hedderik van Rijn
Place of PublicationAustin, TX
PublisherCognitive Science Society
Pages1258-1263
Number of pages6
ISBN (Print)9780976831853
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes
EventAnnual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (31st : 2009) - Amsterdam, Netherlands
Duration: 29 Jul 20091 Aug 2009

Conference

ConferenceAnnual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (31st : 2009)
CityAmsterdam, Netherlands
Period29/07/091/08/09

Keywords

  • decision making
  • information search
  • explore-exploit dilemmas

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When to walk away: the effect of variability on keeping options viable'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this