Abstract
The problems faced by the Mineralogical Society in maximizing the income from the Mineralogical Magazine, Clay Minerals and Mineralogical Abstracts journals are discussed. The reason for the losses ascribed to Mineralogical Abstracts is that the journal is expensive to produce. For mineralogical abstracts to survive it is essential that production costs are reduced and that institutional subscribers are persuaded that it is a product worth buying in addition to the electronic abstracting services.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 11-12 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Mineralogical Society Bulletin |
| Issue number | 137 |
| Publication status | Published - 2003 |