Whither teaching? Academics’ informal learning about teaching in the ‘tiger mother’ university

Laurie Field*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)


    Adopting a pluralistic view of academics’ informal learning that draws on Habermas (1987), this article suggests that a great deal of academic learning results from tensions and incompatibilities between individual interests and those of employing institutions increasingly resonant with the ideology of New Public Management (NPM), with its emphasis on market forces (e.g. student as ‘customer’), enhanced management power, surveillance, and measurement. To explore these ideas further, the article draws on interviews with academics at an Australian university to examine their informal learning about teaching. The academics interviewed had learnt a great deal from the changing context about how teaching is perceived by their institution, as well as about their own personal status and security in the new environment. The paper suggests that the ruthless push of NPM and associated ideologies and pressures impacting on higher education in Western countries represent ‘currents’ running counter to the efforts of academic developers to foster teaching excellence and expertise. The article’s conclusions suggest value in further research into the impact of ideological changes such as NPM on ‘learning about teaching’ in a variety of institutional settings.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)113-125
    Number of pages13
    JournalInternational Journal for Academic Development
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2015


    Dive into the research topics of 'Whither teaching? Academics’ informal learning about teaching in the ‘tiger mother’ university'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this