Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province

Lidan Wang, Anjue Wang, Gerry Fitzgerald, Lei Si, Qicheng Jiang, Dongqing Ye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: The goal of the New Rural Cooperative Medical System (NCMS) is to decrease the financial burden and improve the health of rural areas. The purpose of the present study is to determine how government subsidies vary between poorer and wealthier groups, especially in low-income regions in rural China. Methods: The distribution, amount, and equity of government subsidies delivered via NCMS to rural residents at different economic levels were assessed using benefit-incidence analysis, concentration index, Kakwani index, Gini index, Lorenz curve, and concentration curve. Household and health institution surveys were conducted in 2010, covering 9701 residents. Household socio-economic status, healthcare costs, out-of-pocket payments, and utilization information were collected in household interviews, and reimbursement policy was provided by institutional survey. Results: The government subsidy concentration index was -0.055 for outpatients and 0.505 for inpatients; and the outpatient and inpatient subsidy Kakwani indexes were -0.376 and 0.184, respectively. The poorest 20 % of populations received 3.4 % of the total subsidy output; while the wealthiest 20 % received 54.3 %. The results showed that the distribution of outpatient subsidies was equitable, but the hospital subsidies disproportionally benefited wealthier people. Conclusions: Wealthier people benefited more than poorer people from the NCMS in terms of inpatient and total subsidies. For outpatients, the subsidies were unrelated to ability to pay. This contradicts the common belief that the NCMS does not exacerbate benefit inequity. Long-term policy is required to tackle this problem, specifically of redesign the NCMS reimbursement system.

LanguageEnglish
Article number195
Pages1-8
Number of pages8
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jun 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Government Financing
China
Outpatients
Inpatients
Economics
Rural Health
Aptitude
Health Expenditures
Health Surveys
Health Care Costs
Interviews
Incidence
Population

Bibliographical note

Copyright 2016 Wang et al. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Benefit incidence analysis
  • Concentration index
  • Kakwani index
  • NCMS
  • Subsidy

Cite this

Wang, Lidan ; Wang, Anjue ; Fitzgerald, Gerry ; Si, Lei ; Jiang, Qicheng ; Ye, Dongqing. / Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province. In: BMC Health Services Research. 2016 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 1-8.
@article{4811eb4d53274f749c6006fcb4e41748,
title = "Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province",
abstract = "Background: The goal of the New Rural Cooperative Medical System (NCMS) is to decrease the financial burden and improve the health of rural areas. The purpose of the present study is to determine how government subsidies vary between poorer and wealthier groups, especially in low-income regions in rural China. Methods: The distribution, amount, and equity of government subsidies delivered via NCMS to rural residents at different economic levels were assessed using benefit-incidence analysis, concentration index, Kakwani index, Gini index, Lorenz curve, and concentration curve. Household and health institution surveys were conducted in 2010, covering 9701 residents. Household socio-economic status, healthcare costs, out-of-pocket payments, and utilization information were collected in household interviews, and reimbursement policy was provided by institutional survey. Results: The government subsidy concentration index was -0.055 for outpatients and 0.505 for inpatients; and the outpatient and inpatient subsidy Kakwani indexes were -0.376 and 0.184, respectively. The poorest 20 {\%} of populations received 3.4 {\%} of the total subsidy output; while the wealthiest 20 {\%} received 54.3 {\%}. The results showed that the distribution of outpatient subsidies was equitable, but the hospital subsidies disproportionally benefited wealthier people. Conclusions: Wealthier people benefited more than poorer people from the NCMS in terms of inpatient and total subsidies. For outpatients, the subsidies were unrelated to ability to pay. This contradicts the common belief that the NCMS does not exacerbate benefit inequity. Long-term policy is required to tackle this problem, specifically of redesign the NCMS reimbursement system.",
keywords = "Benefit incidence analysis, Concentration index, Kakwani index, NCMS, Subsidy",
author = "Lidan Wang and Anjue Wang and Gerry Fitzgerald and Lei Si and Qicheng Jiang and Dongqing Ye",
note = "Copyright 2016 Wang et al. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1186/s12913-016-1441-3",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",
number = "1",

}

Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province. / Wang, Lidan; Wang, Anjue; Fitzgerald, Gerry; Si, Lei; Jiang, Qicheng; Ye, Dongqing.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, 195, 05.06.2016, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province

AU - Wang, Lidan

AU - Wang, Anjue

AU - Fitzgerald, Gerry

AU - Si, Lei

AU - Jiang, Qicheng

AU - Ye, Dongqing

N1 - Copyright 2016 Wang et al. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2016/6/5

Y1 - 2016/6/5

N2 - Background: The goal of the New Rural Cooperative Medical System (NCMS) is to decrease the financial burden and improve the health of rural areas. The purpose of the present study is to determine how government subsidies vary between poorer and wealthier groups, especially in low-income regions in rural China. Methods: The distribution, amount, and equity of government subsidies delivered via NCMS to rural residents at different economic levels were assessed using benefit-incidence analysis, concentration index, Kakwani index, Gini index, Lorenz curve, and concentration curve. Household and health institution surveys were conducted in 2010, covering 9701 residents. Household socio-economic status, healthcare costs, out-of-pocket payments, and utilization information were collected in household interviews, and reimbursement policy was provided by institutional survey. Results: The government subsidy concentration index was -0.055 for outpatients and 0.505 for inpatients; and the outpatient and inpatient subsidy Kakwani indexes were -0.376 and 0.184, respectively. The poorest 20 % of populations received 3.4 % of the total subsidy output; while the wealthiest 20 % received 54.3 %. The results showed that the distribution of outpatient subsidies was equitable, but the hospital subsidies disproportionally benefited wealthier people. Conclusions: Wealthier people benefited more than poorer people from the NCMS in terms of inpatient and total subsidies. For outpatients, the subsidies were unrelated to ability to pay. This contradicts the common belief that the NCMS does not exacerbate benefit inequity. Long-term policy is required to tackle this problem, specifically of redesign the NCMS reimbursement system.

AB - Background: The goal of the New Rural Cooperative Medical System (NCMS) is to decrease the financial burden and improve the health of rural areas. The purpose of the present study is to determine how government subsidies vary between poorer and wealthier groups, especially in low-income regions in rural China. Methods: The distribution, amount, and equity of government subsidies delivered via NCMS to rural residents at different economic levels were assessed using benefit-incidence analysis, concentration index, Kakwani index, Gini index, Lorenz curve, and concentration curve. Household and health institution surveys were conducted in 2010, covering 9701 residents. Household socio-economic status, healthcare costs, out-of-pocket payments, and utilization information were collected in household interviews, and reimbursement policy was provided by institutional survey. Results: The government subsidy concentration index was -0.055 for outpatients and 0.505 for inpatients; and the outpatient and inpatient subsidy Kakwani indexes were -0.376 and 0.184, respectively. The poorest 20 % of populations received 3.4 % of the total subsidy output; while the wealthiest 20 % received 54.3 %. The results showed that the distribution of outpatient subsidies was equitable, but the hospital subsidies disproportionally benefited wealthier people. Conclusions: Wealthier people benefited more than poorer people from the NCMS in terms of inpatient and total subsidies. For outpatients, the subsidies were unrelated to ability to pay. This contradicts the common belief that the NCMS does not exacerbate benefit inequity. Long-term policy is required to tackle this problem, specifically of redesign the NCMS reimbursement system.

KW - Benefit incidence analysis

KW - Concentration index

KW - Kakwani index

KW - NCMS

KW - Subsidy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971612074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12913-016-1441-3

DO - 10.1186/s12913-016-1441-3

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - BMC Health Services Research

T2 - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

IS - 1

M1 - 195

ER -