Who do you think you are? Medical student socioeconomic status and intention to work in underserved areas

Barbara Griffin*, Erik Porfeli, Wendy Hu

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A frequently cited rationale for increasing the participation of students from low socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds is that it will create a workforce who will choose to work in low SES and medically underserviced communities. Two theoretical arguments, one that supports and one that contradicts this assumption, are proposed to explain the practice location intentions of medical students which we examine in a longitudinal analysis. SES background and future intentions of 351 applicants to an undergraduate medical degree were assessed at Time 1, with intentions re-assessed one year later for 96% of those who were enrolled as medical students. Students from very low (and very high) SES backgrounds indicated lower intention to practice in low SES or medically underserviced areas than those from mid-range SES backgrounds. Males and students from non-English speaking backgrounds indicated less desire to work in low SES areas, perhaps explained by high aspirational motivation. SES accounted for a relatively small amount of variance in practice intentions. Alternate predictors of practice location, including individual values and training effects, and their implications for selection practice, are discussed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)491-504
    Number of pages14
    JournalAdvances in Health Sciences Education
    Volume22
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017

    Keywords

    • Medically underserviced areas
    • Practice location intentions
    • Socioeconomic status
    • Widening participation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Who do you think you are? Medical student socioeconomic status and intention to work in underserved areas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this