Whose discourse, whose ears?: Harmony in dialogic pedagogy amidst the post-truth noise

Aireen Grace Andal

doi:10.5195/dpj.2019.276

Whose discourse, whose ears? Harmony in dialogic pedagogy amidst the post-truth noise

Aireen Grace Andal

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Commentary on DPJ Editorial by Robin Alexander (2019), Whose discourse? Dialogic Pedagogy for a post-truth world. This commentary adds emphasis on the importance of the four areas of dialogic pedagogy--language, voice, argument and truth-- that Alexander proposes to be invested in and prioritized more. It is argued that dialogic pedagogy will benefit from the development of the current approach to respond to the post-truth era, rather than from looking for new ways to do dialogue. Finally, it is suggested that practitioners of dialogic pedagogy take the post-truth era as a situation that fosters critical thinking and reevaluation of how dialogue is conducted.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	C1-C5
Number of pages	5
Journal	Dialogic Pedagogy
Volume	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2019.276
Publication status	Published - 2019
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Access to Document

10.5195/dpj.2019.276

Publisher version (open access)Final published version, 1.59 MBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{5d31c23aef6446fb967469812621f2b7,

title = "Whose discourse, whose ears?: Harmony in dialogic pedagogy amidst the post-truth noise",

abstract = "Commentary on DPJ Editorial by Robin Alexander (2019), Whose discourse? Dialogic Pedagogy for a post-truth world. This commentary adds emphasis on the importance of the four areas of dialogic pedagogy--language, voice, argument and truth-- that Alexander proposes to be invested in and prioritized more. It is argued that dialogic pedagogy will benefit from the development of the current approach to respond to the post-truth era, rather than from looking for new ways to do dialogue. Finally, it is suggested that practitioners of dialogic pedagogy take the post-truth era as a situation that fosters critical thinking and reevaluation of how dialogue is conducted.",

author = "Andal, \{Aireen Grace\}",

note = "Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.5195/dpj.2019.276",

language = "English",

volume = "7",

pages = "C1--C5",

journal = "Dialogic Pedagogy",

issn = "2325-3290",

publisher = "University Library System, University of Pittsburgh",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Whose discourse, whose ears?

T2 - Harmony in dialogic pedagogy amidst the post-truth noise

AU - Andal, Aireen Grace

N1 - Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Commentary on DPJ Editorial by Robin Alexander (2019), Whose discourse? Dialogic Pedagogy for a post-truth world. This commentary adds emphasis on the importance of the four areas of dialogic pedagogy--language, voice, argument and truth-- that Alexander proposes to be invested in and prioritized more. It is argued that dialogic pedagogy will benefit from the development of the current approach to respond to the post-truth era, rather than from looking for new ways to do dialogue. Finally, it is suggested that practitioners of dialogic pedagogy take the post-truth era as a situation that fosters critical thinking and reevaluation of how dialogue is conducted.

AB - Commentary on DPJ Editorial by Robin Alexander (2019), Whose discourse? Dialogic Pedagogy for a post-truth world. This commentary adds emphasis on the importance of the four areas of dialogic pedagogy--language, voice, argument and truth-- that Alexander proposes to be invested in and prioritized more. It is argued that dialogic pedagogy will benefit from the development of the current approach to respond to the post-truth era, rather than from looking for new ways to do dialogue. Finally, it is suggested that practitioners of dialogic pedagogy take the post-truth era as a situation that fosters critical thinking and reevaluation of how dialogue is conducted.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85064718475

U2 - 10.5195/dpj.2019.276

DO - 10.5195/dpj.2019.276

M3 - Article

SN - 2325-3290

VL - 7

SP - C1-C5

JO - Dialogic Pedagogy

JF - Dialogic Pedagogy

ER -

Whose discourse, whose ears? Harmony in dialogic pedagogy amidst the post-truth noise

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this