Why aren't warning signals everywhere? On the prevalence of aposematism and mimicry in communities

David W. Kikuchi*, Marie E. Herberstein, Michael Barfield, Robert D. Holt, Johanna Mappes

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    21 Citations (Scopus)
    22 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Warning signals are a striking example of natural selection present in almost every ecological community – from Nordic meadows to tropical rainforests, defended prey species and their mimics ward off potential predators before they attack. Yet despite the wide distribution of warning signals, they are relatively scarce as a proportion of the total prey available, and more so in some biomes than others. Classically, warning signals are thought to be governed by positive density-dependent selection, i.e. they succeed better when they are more common. Therefore, after surmounting this initial barrier to their evolution, it is puzzling that they remain uncommon on the scale of the community. Here, we explore factors likely to determine the prevalence of warning signals in prey assemblages. These factors include the nature of prey defences and any constraints upon them, the behavioural interactions of predators with different prey defences, the numerical responses of predators governed by movement and reproduction, the diversity and abundance of undefended alternative prey and Batesian mimics in the community, and variability in other ecological circumstances. We also discuss the macroevolution of warning signals. Our review finds that we have a basic understanding of how many species in some taxonomic groups have warning signals, but very little information on the interrelationships among population abundances across prey communities, the diversity of signal phenotypes, and prey defences. We also have detailed knowledge of how a few generalist predator species forage in artificial laboratory environments, but we know much less about how predators forage in complex natural communities with variable prey defences. We describe how empirical work to address each of these knowledge gaps can test specific hypotheses for why warning signals exhibit their particular patterns of distribution. This will help us to understand how behavioural interactions shape ecological communities.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2446-2460
    Number of pages15
    JournalBiological Reviews
    Volume96
    Issue number6
    Early online date15 Jun 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021

    Bibliographical note

    Copyright the Author(s) 2021. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

    Keywords

    • community ecology
    • predator–prey interactions
    • ecological niche
    • Batesian mimicry
    • Müllerian mimicry
    • aposematism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Why aren't warning signals everywhere? On the prevalence of aposematism and mimicry in communities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this