Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing

Heather Sheridan*, Erik D. Reichle, Eyal M. Reingold

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To examine the role of inter-word spaces during reading, we used a gaze-contingent boundary paradigm to manipulate parafoveal preview (i.e., valid vs. invalid preview) in a normal text condition that contained spaces (e.g., “John decided to sell the table”) and in an unsegmented text condition that contained random numbers instead of spaces (e.g.,“John4decided8to5sell9the7table”). Preview effects on mean first-fixation durations were larger for normal than unsegmented text conditions, and survival analyses revealed a delay in the onset of both preview validity and word-frequency effects on first-fixation durations for unsegmented relative to normal text. Taken together with simulations that were conducted using the E-Z Reader model, the present findings indicated that unsegmented text deficits reflect disruptions to both parafoveal processing and lexical processing. We discuss the implications of our results for models of eye-movement control.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1543-1552
Number of pages10
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • reading and eye movements
  • time course
  • distributional analysis
  • computational modeling
  • lexical processing
  • parafoveal processing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this