Why is measuring communication difficult? A critical review of current speech pathology concepts and measures

Scott Barnes, Steven Bloch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Human society is organised through communicative interactions between co-present people. Speech pathology (SP) assessment and intervention strategies aim to access these sites of communication in order to facilitate participation in life situations for people with communication disorders. Surprisingly, however, there is no explicit theory of communication underpinning SP practice and research. As a result, the conceptual and practical basis for rigorous, empirical measurement of communication remains limited, which is a significant challenge for professional practice and research. This critical review discusses the prevailing ways that co-present communication has been conceptualised and measured in SP. In particular, we examine how models of health have informed current ideas and measurement practices. We argue that although patently valuable for SP, they are largely incommensurate with the realities of co-present communication. Drawing on current empirical research in Sociology and Linguistics, we specify the properties of real-time co-present communication and discuss their relationship to current SP concepts and measurement practices. We conclude by suggesting directions for conceptual development and empirical research that will draw SP assessment and intervention strategies closer to real-time co-present communication.

LanguageEnglish
Pages219-236
Number of pages18
JournalClinical Linguistics and Phonetics
Volume33
Issue number3
Early online date23 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Speech-Language Pathology
pathology
Communication
communication
Empirical Research
present
intervention strategy
empirical research
Communication Disorders
Professional Practice
Sociology
communication disorder
Linguistics
Research
life situation
Speech Pathology
Critical Review
sociology
linguistics
Health

Cite this

@article{f48fa48044ae48ad9b9a411cf26252ed,
title = "Why is measuring communication difficult? A critical review of current speech pathology concepts and measures",
abstract = "Human society is organised through communicative interactions between co-present people. Speech pathology (SP) assessment and intervention strategies aim to access these sites of communication in order to facilitate participation in life situations for people with communication disorders. Surprisingly, however, there is no explicit theory of communication underpinning SP practice and research. As a result, the conceptual and practical basis for rigorous, empirical measurement of communication remains limited, which is a significant challenge for professional practice and research. This critical review discusses the prevailing ways that co-present communication has been conceptualised and measured in SP. In particular, we examine how models of health have informed current ideas and measurement practices. We argue that although patently valuable for SP, they are largely incommensurate with the realities of co-present communication. Drawing on current empirical research in Sociology and Linguistics, we specify the properties of real-time co-present communication and discuss their relationship to current SP concepts and measurement practices. We conclude by suggesting directions for conceptual development and empirical research that will draw SP assessment and intervention strategies closer to real-time co-present communication.",
keywords = "communication, speech pathology, enchrony",
author = "Scott Barnes and Steven Bloch",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/02699206.2018.1498541",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "219--236",
journal = "Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics",
issn = "0269-9206",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

Why is measuring communication difficult? A critical review of current speech pathology concepts and measures. / Barnes, Scott; Bloch, Steven.

In: Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2019, p. 219-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why is measuring communication difficult? A critical review of current speech pathology concepts and measures

AU - Barnes,Scott

AU - Bloch,Steven

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Human society is organised through communicative interactions between co-present people. Speech pathology (SP) assessment and intervention strategies aim to access these sites of communication in order to facilitate participation in life situations for people with communication disorders. Surprisingly, however, there is no explicit theory of communication underpinning SP practice and research. As a result, the conceptual and practical basis for rigorous, empirical measurement of communication remains limited, which is a significant challenge for professional practice and research. This critical review discusses the prevailing ways that co-present communication has been conceptualised and measured in SP. In particular, we examine how models of health have informed current ideas and measurement practices. We argue that although patently valuable for SP, they are largely incommensurate with the realities of co-present communication. Drawing on current empirical research in Sociology and Linguistics, we specify the properties of real-time co-present communication and discuss their relationship to current SP concepts and measurement practices. We conclude by suggesting directions for conceptual development and empirical research that will draw SP assessment and intervention strategies closer to real-time co-present communication.

AB - Human society is organised through communicative interactions between co-present people. Speech pathology (SP) assessment and intervention strategies aim to access these sites of communication in order to facilitate participation in life situations for people with communication disorders. Surprisingly, however, there is no explicit theory of communication underpinning SP practice and research. As a result, the conceptual and practical basis for rigorous, empirical measurement of communication remains limited, which is a significant challenge for professional practice and research. This critical review discusses the prevailing ways that co-present communication has been conceptualised and measured in SP. In particular, we examine how models of health have informed current ideas and measurement practices. We argue that although patently valuable for SP, they are largely incommensurate with the realities of co-present communication. Drawing on current empirical research in Sociology and Linguistics, we specify the properties of real-time co-present communication and discuss their relationship to current SP concepts and measurement practices. We conclude by suggesting directions for conceptual development and empirical research that will draw SP assessment and intervention strategies closer to real-time co-present communication.

KW - communication

KW - speech pathology

KW - enchrony

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050543243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02699206.2018.1498541

DO - 10.1080/02699206.2018.1498541

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 219

EP - 236

JO - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics

T2 - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics

JF - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics

SN - 0269-9206

IS - 3

ER -