Wider consultation on pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Frances Rapport*, Hayley A. Hutchings, Sarah Wright, Marcus A. Doel, Clare Clement, Keir Lewis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article we examine whether an innovative mixed method approach could highlight the positive and challenging effects of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programme (PRP) on the Quality of Life (QOL) of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). In 2012, we conducted three consultation workshops in Mid-West Wales, UK, with COPD patients that participated in a PRP, their significant others (e.g. spouses and partners), and healthcare professionals who delivered the PRP. We found that there was a resounding enthusiasm for the content and impact of the programme, particularly in the areas of: increased patient activity, enhanced patient control and confidence, a greater willingness to self-manage treatment, and an increased sense of group belonging. Seven key themes mattered most to our study participants: the patient, physical health, mental health, the programme, professionals and significant others, knowledge and education, and the future. We used these themes to craft a best-practice outcomes document (template) of the benefits and challenges of the PRP to inform and support future service evaluation and delivery.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalForum Qualitative Sozialforschung
Volume16
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2015. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Wider consultation on pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this