Abstract
This chapter challenges the postwork critique of the work society and work ethic. The contention is that in responding to the problems posed by contemporary work we need to still insist on work's social centrality, not reject it. One error of the postwork stance is that, in its rejection of work's centrality, it targets an overly restricted notion and experience of work. A further problem is its failure to properly register the individual and social goods people can and do attain through work. This is compounded by a failure to realize that the movement towards a more free and just society in fact requires the endorsement of a work ethic, albeit one different from earlier forms and alive to the dangers of its being harnessed by regressive forces.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Debating a post-work future |
Subtitle of host publication | perspectives from philosophy and the social sciences |
Editors | Denise Celentano, Michael Chobi, Jean-Philippe Deranty, Kory P. Schaff |
Place of Publication | New York ; London |
Publisher | Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group |
Chapter | 6 |
Pages | 131-150 |
Number of pages | 20 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781003321033 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781032342122, 9781032342153 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- post-work
- post-work society
- work ethic