Work and the work ethic: a critique of postwork arguments

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This chapter challenges the postwork critique of the work society and work ethic. The contention is that in responding to the problems posed by contemporary work we need to still insist on work's social centrality, not reject it. One error of the postwork stance is that, in its rejection of work's centrality, it targets an overly restricted notion and experience of work. A further problem is its failure to properly register the individual and social goods people can and do attain through work. This is compounded by a failure to realize that the movement towards a more free and just society in fact requires the endorsement of a work ethic, albeit one different from earlier forms and alive to the dangers of its being harnessed by regressive forces.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationDebating a post-work future
    Subtitle of host publicationperspectives from philosophy and the social sciences
    EditorsDenise Celentano, Michael Chobi, Jean-Philippe Deranty, Kory P. Schaff
    Place of PublicationNew York ; London
    PublisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francis Group
    Chapter6
    Pages131-150
    Number of pages20
    ISBN (Electronic)9781003321033
    ISBN (Print)9781032342122, 9781032342153
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2024

    Bibliographical note

    Accepted Author Manuscript Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

    Keywords

    • post-work
    • post-work society
    • work ethic

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Work and the work ethic: a critique of postwork arguments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this