Working together: bridging the researcher-practitioner gap

Daniel Druckman, William A. Donohue*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
73 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article we share our professional experiences in bridging the gap between research and practice. These experiences are discussed from the standpoint of the roles of consulting analyst and conciliator. Five research-practice areas are viewed through the lens of the former role: alliance dynamics, issue re-framing, sources of conflict, procedural justice, and turning points. Three areas are discussed from the latter perspective: goals and motivations, cognitive and motivational biases, and relationship development. Each theme is organized into three parts that illuminate the value of research knowledge for practices at both a macro and micro level of analysis: research related to the theme, the type of assignment and the practical applications related to that assignment, and lessons learned for practice. Implications of this type of career for our view of social science are developed in a final section along with suggestions for graduate education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-206
Number of pages20
JournalNegotiation and Conflict Management Research
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Publisher 2022. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • analyst
  • conciliator
  • conflict analysis
  • micro and macro levels
  • negotiation
  • research-practice interface

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Working together: bridging the researcher-practitioner gap'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this