Abstract
Mark Ramseyer has been a leading force in bringing to bear the methods of Law and
Economics to a continuing analysis of the Japanese legal and economic system. He has
deliberately assumed an iconoclastic position in debunking a number of widely held
beliefs about Japan. In this paper we analyse Ramseyer’s contribution and conclude that he has too frequently let ideological objectives interfere with what should be cool headed analysis. While asking many of the right questions he unfortunately has let a priori assumptions determine his answers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Essays in Heterodox Economics |
| Subtitle of host publication | proceedings, refereed papers |
| Editors | Peter Kriesler, Michael Johnson, John Lodewijks |
| Place of Publication | Sydney, Australia |
| Publisher | University of New South Wales |
| Pages | 129-154 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780733424175 |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
| Event | Australian society of heterodox economists conference (5th : 2006) - Sydney Duration: 11 Dec 2006 → 12 Dec 2006 |
Conference
| Conference | Australian society of heterodox economists conference (5th : 2006) |
|---|---|
| City | Sydney |
| Period | 11/12/06 → 12/12/06 |
Keywords
- Ramseyer
- Japan
- law and economics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'You say tomato, I say tomahto, let's call the whole thing off: the Chicago School of Law and Economics comes to Japan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver